Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions
- PMID: 9667278
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2557
Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions
Abstract
Purpose and methods: The expanding role of oral chemotherapy in oncology is suggested by the abundance of orally formulated agents currently in development. The pharmacoeconomic principles that drive oral drug formulation are discussed. Patient preference for oral therapy is identified as a second major impetus for the design of oral cytotoxics. While the rationale for oral formulations is apparent, substantial patient compliance and pharmacokinetic limitations have been identified for this route of administration. Specific aspects of bioavailability limitations and patient compliance are discussed. Relevant pharmacokinetic data for each orally formulated chemotherapy agent are compared and selected novel oral cytotoxics and cytotoxic modulators are discussed.
Results: A review of pharmacokinetic literature suggests substantial variability in bioavailability for many orally formulated cancer cytotoxics. While these findings are observed for all classes of oral drugs, the issue is especially critical for cancer chemotherapy, in which a narrow therapeutic index is frequently observed. Improved bioavailability and reduced interpatient biovariability are therefore desirable for new cytotoxic formulations. Pharmacologic manipulations to improve bioavailability and reduce costs are examined.
Conclusion: Oral chemotherapy represents a fundamental change in contemporary oncology practice, driven by pharmacoeconomic issues, patient convenience, and the potential for improved patient quality of life. Novel cytostatic therapies that require protracted drug administration periods will also favor an oral formulation. While the use of oral chemotherapy may initially be limited to metastatic disease palliation, demonstration of equivalent efficacy would allow for its subsequent use in adjuvant settings. This efficacy is contingent on circumventing bioavailability limitations and patient noncompliance. The development of specific, low-toxicity inhibitors of CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and other drug metabolizing enzymes such as dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase represents a major innovative step in the successful formulation of oral chemotherapy.
Comment in
-
Current status of oral anticancer drugs in Japan.J Clin Oncol. 1999 Oct;17(10):3362-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3362. J Clin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10506642 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Clinical pharmacology of anticancer agents in relation to formulations and administration routes.Cancer Treat Rev. 1999 Apr;25(2):83-101. doi: 10.1053/ctrv.1998.0107. Cancer Treat Rev. 1999. PMID: 10395834 Review.
-
Diverse approaches for the enhancement of oral drug bioavailability.Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2011 May;32(4):185-209. doi: 10.1002/bdd.750. Epub 2011 Apr 7. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2011. PMID: 21480294 Review.
-
Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Jun;52(6):399-414. doi: 10.1007/s40262-013-0040-2. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013. PMID: 23420518 Review.
-
Taxanes: old drugs, new oral formulations.Eur J Pharmacol. 2013 Oct 5;717(1-3):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.02.058. Epub 2013 May 7. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23660368 Review.
-
Effects of food on the clinical pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents: underlying mechanisms and implications for oral chemotherapy.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(15):1127-56. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443150-00005. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004. PMID: 15568891 Review.
Cited by
-
Polymeric nanoparticle drug delivery technologies for oral delivery applications.Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015;12(9):1459-73. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2015.1018175. Epub 2015 Mar 26. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015. PMID: 25813361 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability of oral topotecan: a population analysis.Br J Cancer. 2004 Jan 26;90(2):343-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601469. Br J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 14735174 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group early phase II trial of S-1 in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.Br J Cancer. 2003 Mar 10;88(5):648-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600781. Br J Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12659110 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Targeted Delivery of Cisplatin-Derived Nanoprecursors via a Biomimetic Yeast Microcapsule for Tumor Therapy by the Oral Route.Theranostics. 2019 Aug 21;9(22):6568-6586. doi: 10.7150/thno.35353. eCollection 2019. Theranostics. 2019. PMID: 31588236 Free PMC article.
-
Oral anticancer drugs in the elderly: an overview.Drugs Aging. 2007;24(5):395-410. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200724050-00004. Drugs Aging. 2007. PMID: 17503896 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous