Consensus standards for the process of cancer care: a modified expert panel method applied to head and neck cancer. South and West Expert Tumour Panel for Head and Neck Cancer
- PMID: 9667669
- PMCID: PMC2150344
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.319
Consensus standards for the process of cancer care: a modified expert panel method applied to head and neck cancer. South and West Expert Tumour Panel for Head and Neck Cancer
Abstract
There are many pressures to improve the standard of care delivered to cancer patients, including the reforms subsequent to the Calman-Hine report. The establishment of standards is a prerequisite for audit, benchmarking and certification of cancer centres and units. Randomized trials of head and neck cancer are uncommon, and other forms of evidence often conflicting. In the south and west of England, a multidisciplinary expert panel consensus method has been applied to the development of standards. A panel representative of specialties involved in the process of care at all three levels, plus social medicine and lay members, was constructed. A model for the process of care was developed consisting of activity areas. For each activity, a near exhaustive list of tasks and standards was established. A three-iteration method with statistical group response was then used to refine the standards. The same method was also applied to the production of a minimum data set for registration, recording and audit. The resulting standards will be regularly reviewed. We have developed a model of the care process, and an expert panel methodology that is applicable to a wide range of problems in clinical oncology.
Similar articles
-
Performance and standards for the process of head and neck cancer care: South and West audit of head and neck cancer 1996-1997 (SWAHN I). South and West Regional Cancer Organisation Tumour Panel for Head and Neck Cancer.Br J Cancer. 2000 Aug;83(4):421-5. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1302. Br J Cancer. 2000. PMID: 10945484 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England.Br J Cancer. 2004 Oct 18;91(8):1477-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602118. Br J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15467772 Free PMC article.
-
Provision and quality assurance for head and neck cancer care.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Oct;38(5):543-5. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0460. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000. PMID: 11010792
-
EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum.Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):1.e1-1.e34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.048. Epub 2013 Oct 31. Eur J Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24183379
-
ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) Aggressive Nonmelanomatous Skin Cancer of the Head and Neck.Head Neck. 2016 Feb;38(2):175-82. doi: 10.1002/hed.24171. Head Neck. 2016. PMID: 26791005
Cited by
-
Performance and standards for the process of head and neck cancer care: South and West audit of head and neck cancer 1996-1997 (SWAHN I). South and West Regional Cancer Organisation Tumour Panel for Head and Neck Cancer.Br J Cancer. 2000 Aug;83(4):421-5. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1302. Br J Cancer. 2000. PMID: 10945484 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England.Br J Cancer. 2004 Oct 18;91(8):1477-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602118. Br J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15467772 Free PMC article.
-
Providing cancer services to remote and rural areas: consensus study.Br J Cancer. 2003 Sep 1;89(5):821-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601166. Br J Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12942111 Free PMC article.
-
Eliciting views of patients with head and neck cancer and carers on professionally derived standards for care.BMJ. 2002 Mar 2;324(7336):516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.516. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 11872549 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical