Implantable bioelectric interfaces for lost nerve functions
- PMID: 9670213
- DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00013-6
Implantable bioelectric interfaces for lost nerve functions
Abstract
Neuronal cells are unique within the organism. In addition to forming long-distance connections with other nerve cells and non-neuronal targets, they lose the ability to regenerate their neurites and to divide during maturation. Consequently, external violations like trauma or disease frequently lead to their disappearance and replacement by non-neuronal, and thus not properly functioning cells. The advent of microtechnology and construction of artificial implants prompted to create particular devices for specialised regions of the nervous system, in order to compensate for the loss of function. The scope of the present work is to review the current devices in connection with their applicability and functional perspectives. (1) Successful implants like the cochlea implant and peripherally implantable stimulators are discussed. (2) Less developed and not yet applicable devices like retinal or cortical implants are introduced, with particular emphasis given to the reasons for their failure to replace very complex functions like vision. (3) Material research is presented both from the technological aspect and from their biocompatibility as prerequisite of any implantation. (4) Finally, basic studies are presented, which deal with methods of shaping the implants, procedures of testing biocompatibility and modification of improving the interfaces between a technical device and the biological environment. The review ends by pointing to future perspectives in neuroimplantation and restoration of interrupted neuronal pathways.
Similar articles
-
Implantable visual prostheses.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97(Pt 2):465-72. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_53. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007. PMID: 17691336 Review.
-
Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis.Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:317-32. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17522-2. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19660665 Review.
-
Clinical challenges and opportunities related to the biological responses experienced by indwelling and implantable bioelectronic medical devices.Acta Biomater. 2025 Jan 24;193:49-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.12.037. Epub 2024 Dec 14. Acta Biomater. 2025. PMID: 39675496 Review.
-
Soft implantable microelectrodes for future medicine: prosthetics, neural signal recording and neuromodulation.Lab Chip. 2016 Mar 21;16(6):959-76. doi: 10.1039/c5lc00842e. Epub 2016 Feb 18. Lab Chip. 2016. PMID: 26891410 Review.
-
[Biomaterials in cochlear implants].Laryngorhinootologie. 2009 May;88 Suppl 1:S12-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119552. Epub 2009 Apr 7. Laryngorhinootologie. 2009. PMID: 19353453 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Slippery Epidural ECoG Electrode for High-Performance Neural Recording and Interface.Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;12(11):1044. doi: 10.3390/bios12111044. Biosensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36421162 Free PMC article.
-
Electrochemically stimulating developments in bioelectronic medicine.Bioelectron Med. 2018 Mar 15;4:1. doi: 10.1186/s42234-018-0001-z. eCollection 2018. Bioelectron Med. 2018. PMID: 32232077 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hydrogel-electrospun fiber mat composite coatings for neural prostheses.Front Neuroeng. 2011 Mar 11;4:2. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2011.00002. eCollection 2011. Front Neuroeng. 2011. PMID: 21441993 Free PMC article.
-
Biomedical Implants with Charge-Transfer Monitoring and Regulating Abilities.Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021 Aug;8(16):e2004393. doi: 10.1002/advs.202004393. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021. PMID: 34166584 Free PMC article. Review.
-
NeuroMEMS: Neural Probe Microtechnologies.Sensors (Basel). 2008 Oct 25;8(10):6704-6726. doi: 10.3390/s8106704. Sensors (Basel). 2008. PMID: 27873894 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources