Malignant glioma: should chemotherapy be overthrown by experimental treatments?

Abstract

Despite more than two decades of clinical research with chemotherapy, the outcome of malignant gliomas remains poor. Recent years have seen major advances in elucidation of the biology of these tumors, which in turn have led to the current development of innovative therapeutic strategies. The question confronting us at the end of the 1990s is whether we should continue to use and investigate chemotherapy or whether the time has come for experimental treatments. As a contribution to this debate, we reviewed the abundant literature on chemotherapy of malignant glioma, paying special attention to methodological features. The new treatment approaches based on current knowledge about glioma biology are then briefly summarized. Assessment of more than 20 years of chemotherapy trials is discouraging despite a few areas of modest success. Only patients with specific histology (oligodendroglioma, anaplastic astrocytoma) and good prognostic factors (young age, good performance status) may benefit from chemotherapy, with a possible reversal of neurological dysfunction. However, the real impact on survival is small (anaplastic astrocytoma) or undefined (oligodendroglioma). Furthermore, it is unfortunately obvious that the outcome of glioblastoma patients is not significantly modified by chemotherapy. We believe the time has come to explore the potential of novel biological therapies in glioblastoma patients. This could also be proposed for anaplastic astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma patients after failure of chemotherapy.