A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
- PMID: 9681085
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1008217613774
A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Abstract
Purpose: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen.
Patients and methods: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed.
Results: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia.
Conclusions: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.
Similar articles
-
Preliminary report on a phase I study of ifosfamide and vinorelbine (navelbine) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 1996 Apr;23(2 Suppl 5):11-8. Semin Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8610230 Clinical Trial.
-
Ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: two phase I studies.Semin Oncol. 1996 Jun;23(3 Suppl 6):11-5. Semin Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8677441 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase I study of vinorelbine and ifosfamide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):884-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.884. J Clin Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9060524 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of ifosfamide and vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.Semin Oncol. 1998 Feb;25(1 Suppl 2):8-14. Semin Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9535205 Review.
-
Single-agent paclitaxel and paclitaxel/non-platinum combination therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 1999 Oct;26(5 Suppl 16):51-61; discussion 71-2. Semin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10585009 Review.
Cited by
-
Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.Invest New Drugs. 2000 May;18(2):157-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1006330030333. Invest New Drugs. 2000. PMID: 10857995 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical