Rationale and design for the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Trial
- PMID: 9683312
- DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00013-0
Rationale and design for the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Trial
Abstract
The Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Trial is a randomized, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, two-arm, actively controlled, multicenter, international 5-year clinical trial involving 15,000 patients. CONVINCE will compare the incidence of fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular-disease-related death in two antihypertensive treatment regimens. One treatment arm begins with controlled onset-extended release (COER)-verapamil, which has its major antihypertensive effect 6-12 hours after administration. The other arm (standard of care (SOC)) begins with either hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or atenolol, one of which is preselected by the investigator for an individual patient prior to randomization. Secondary objectives include comparisons of the regimens for each of the components of the primary endpoint (separately), death or hospitalization related to cardiovascular disease, efficacy in lowering blood pressure to goal, primary events occurring between 6 am and noon, all-cause mortality, withdrawals from blinded therapy, cancer, and hospitalizations due to bleeding. Patients may be enrolled if they are hypertensive and at least 55 years of age and have an established second risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Initial medications include COER-verapamil (180 mg/d), HCTZ (12.5 mg/d), or atenolol (50 mg/d). Initial doses are doubled if blood pressure (BP) does not reach goal (systolic BP < 140 mm and diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg). If BP is not controlled by the higher dose of the initial medication, HCTZ is added to COER-verapamil, or the SOC choice not initially selected is added in the SOC arm. An ACE-inhibitor is recommended (although nearly any open-label medication is allowed) as the third step for patients whose BP is not adequately controlled or who have a contraindication to one of the two SOC medications. Patients take two sets of tablets daily, one in the morning and one in the evening. Although most patients switch from an established antihypertensive medication to randomized treatment, untreated patients with stages I-III hypertension (SBP between 140 and 190 or DBP between 90 and 110 mm Hg) are eligible. Outcomes are monitored by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Enrollment began during the third quarter of 1996, and follow-up is to be completed in the third quarter of 2002.
Similar articles
-
Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) trial.JAMA. 2003 Apr 23-30;289(16):2073-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.16.2073. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 12709465 Clinical Trial.
-
A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2805-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.21.2805. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 14657064 Clinical Trial.
-
Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.Clin Ther. 2001 Jun;23(6):833-50. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80072-2. Clin Ther. 2001. PMID: 11440284 Clinical Trial.
-
[Calcium antagonists in cardiovascular disease. Clinical evidence from morbidity and mortality trials].Drugs. 2000;59 Spec No 2:25-37. Drugs. 2000. PMID: 11002856 Review. French.
-
Trandolapril: a newer angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.Clin Ther. 2003 Mar;25(3):713-75. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80107-8. Clin Ther. 2003. PMID: 12852701 Review.
Cited by
-
Lessons learned from prematurely terminated clinical trials.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2001 Aug;3(4):360-6. doi: 10.1007/s11906-001-0099-2. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2001. PMID: 11470019 Review.
-
Renal artery stenosis as a cause of renal impairment: implications for treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.J R Soc Med. 1999 Oct;92(10):505-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689909201004. J R Soc Med. 1999. PMID: 10692901 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 13;7(7):CD008161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008161.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37439548 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment with enalapril and not diltiazem ameliorated progression of chronic kidney disease in rats, and normalized renal AT1 receptor expression as measured with PET imaging.PLoS One. 2017 May 19;12(5):e0177451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177451. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28542215 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical pharmacology-physiology conference. A chrono-therapeutic approach to the treatment of hypertension.Int Urol Nephrol. 2001;33(2):265-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1015267132678. Int Urol Nephrol. 2001. PMID: 12092639 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous