Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Jul;13(7):447-54.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00133.x.

Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives

G S Fischer  1 , J A Tulsky, M R Rose, L A Siminoff, R M Arnold
Affiliations

Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives

G S Fischer et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To determine patient knowledge about life-sustaining treatments and physician understanding of patient preferences for proxies and treatments after outpatient discussions about advance directives.

Design: Cross-sectional interview-based and questionnaire-based survey.

Setting: Two university general internal medicine practices, two Department of Veterans Affairs general internal medicine practices, and one university-based geriatrics practice, in two different cities.

Patients: Fifty-six patients of primary care internists.

Intervention: Physicians discussed "advance directives" (ADs) with one randomly selected patient during an outpatient visit.

Measurements and main results: After the discussions, physicians identified the patient's proxy and predicted the patient's preferences for treatment in 20 scenarios. Patients provided treatment preferences in the 20 scenarios, the name of their preferred surrogate decision maker, and their understanding of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation. Of the 39 patients who discussed resuscitation, 43% were able to identify two important characteristics; 26% identified none; 66% did not know that most patients need mechanical ventilation after undergoing resuscitation. None of the 43 patients who had a discussion about mechanical ventilation had a good understanding of it; 67% did not know that patients generally cannot talk while on ventilators; 46% expressed serious misconceptions about ventilators. There was poor agreement between physicians and their patients regarding treatment preferences in 18 of 20 scenarios (kappa -0.04 to 0.31). Physicians correctly identified the proxy 89% of the time (kappa 0.78).

Conclusions: Patients leave routine AD discussions with serious misconceptions about life-sustaining treatments. Physicians are unable to predict treatment preferences but do learn about patients' preferences for surrogate decision makers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • End-of-life decision making.
    Ventres WB. Ventres WB. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jan;14(1):68. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00286.x. J Gen Intern Med. 1999. PMID: 10189250 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Teno JM, Nelson HL, Lynn J. Advance care planning: priorities for ethical and empirical research. Hastings Cent Rep. 1994;24:S32–6. - PubMed
    1. Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care—a case for greater use. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:889–95. - PubMed
    1. Layson RT, Adelman HM, Wallach PM, Pfeifer MP, Johnston S, McNutt RA. Discussions about the use of life-sustaining treatments: a literature review of physicians' and patients' attitudes and practices. J Clin Ethics. 1994;5:195–203. - PubMed
    1. Loewy EH, Carlson RW. Talking, advance directives, and medical practice. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2265–7. - PubMed
    1. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Patients who lack decision-making capacity . In: Deciding to Forgo Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. Washington, DC: President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research; 1983. pp. 121–70.

Publication types