[Malpractice claims against radiologists. Analysis of the five-year period 1993-1997]
- PMID: 9687929
[Malpractice claims against radiologists. Analysis of the five-year period 1993-1997]
Abstract
Introduction: The insurance claims against Italian radiologists over a five-year period (1993-97) were anonymously evaluated, based on pertinent data provided by the Insurance Company of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology.
Material and methods: The database analyzed represents over one third of Italian radiologists. A total number of 171 insurance claims were analyzed and classified by cause as due to: 1) misidiagnosis; 2) alleged malpractice when performing the examination; 3) missed referral to other diagnostic/therapeutic procedures; 4) iatrogenic lesions by ionizing/nonionizing radiations; 5) patient's injury occurring during the examination; 6) lawsuits after the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 589) in case of patient's death (although not directly related to the radiologist's work).
Results: In the first three-year period, the rate of claims was 25.8 per thousand persons/year. Each Italian radiologist has a 90% risk of being sied by a patient once in his/her professional life (35 years). Alleged malpractice accounted for more than 75% of the claims. Misdiagnosis represented the first and most important claims category (43.9% of total). The most common misdiagnoses were the failure to diagnose lesions affecting bones and joints, chest, abdomen and breast. The second most important claim category (20.5%) was complications, frequently occurring during interventional procedures and contrast media injection. Fewer claims (7.6%) originated from patient's injury occurring in the radiology department during the execution of the examination. Finally, radiologists were frequently sved together with medical (or surgical) doctors in case of patient's death, according to the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.
Conclusions: Legal claims against radiologists are a relevant phenomenon also in our country and represent an actual risk for radiologists' professional activity.
Similar articles
-
[Malpractice claims against radiologists in Italy. Trends in 1993-1995].Radiol Med. 1997 Mar;93(3):284-6. Radiol Med. 1997. PMID: 9221424 Italian.
-
[An analysis of insurance claims of civil responsibility in radiology. The first Italian data].Radiol Med. 1996 Mar;91(3):275-8. Radiol Med. 1996. PMID: 8628942 Italian.
-
A 12-year follow-up study of malpractice claims against radiologists in Italy.Radiol Med. 2006 Oct;111(7):1009-22. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0099-z. Epub 2006 Oct 11. Radiol Med. 2006. PMID: 17021681 English, Italian.
-
Medical malpractice in gastroenterology.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jun;6(6):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.02.047. Epub 2008 May 5. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008. PMID: 18456572 Review.
-
Pediatric radiology malpractice claims - characteristics and comparison to adult radiology claims.Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Jun;47(7):808-816. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3873-2. Epub 2017 May 23. Pediatr Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28536766 Review.
Cited by
-
Medical school attended as a predictor of medical malpractice claims.Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Oct;12(5):330-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.330. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003. PMID: 14532363 Free PMC article.
-
Work stress and metabolic syndrome in radiologists: first evidence.Radiol Med. 2014 Feb;119(2):142-8. doi: 10.1007/s11547-013-0329-0. Epub 2013 Dec 3. Radiol Med. 2014. PMID: 24297580
-
Malpractice claims in interventional radiology: frequency, characteristics and protective measures.Radiol Med. 2013 Apr;118(3):504-17. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0878-7. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Radiol Med. 2013. PMID: 22986698