Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 May;48(430):1224-7.

Developing the Cambridge palliative audit schedule (CAMPAS): a palliative care audit for primary health care teams

Affiliations

Developing the Cambridge palliative audit schedule (CAMPAS): a palliative care audit for primary health care teams

M S Rogers et al. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 May.

Abstract

Background: Problems with the provision of palliative care have been reported. Audit is one means of improving care. Earlier audits of primary care palliative care have been initiated by general practitioners (GPs) and are predominantly retrospective record reviews. Widely applicable methods for the audit of primary care palliative care do not exist.

Aim: To develop relevant palliative care standards and to devise an audit schedule (the Cambridge palliative audit schedule, CAMPAS) suitable for monitoring palliative care in diverse primary care settings.

Method: Primary health care team (PHCT) members collaborated at all stages. Reasonable outcomes and acceptable interventions for PHCTs were identified and standards developed. Each standard was constructed to ensure uniform interpretation, and CAMPAS was structured to collect data necessary for determining whether the standards were met.

Results: Over 50% of PHCTs (n = 20) in the health district were recruited and trained to use CAMPAS. A total of 876 contacts with 29 patients was recorded by PHCTs using CAMPAS. Considerable inter- and intra-PHCT variation was found in the achievement of the standards.

Conclusions: The favourable participation rate suggests commitment to audit and improvement in patient care. Overall, the standards were reported to be suitable. Although 100% achievement of some standards may be unrealistic, the level of attainment for many suggests that it is possible. CAMPAS has been reported to be a useful structure for recording assessments and monitoring care, as well as a usable audit schedule. As an audit tool, it identified areas in need of improvement and facilitated feed-back to participants. Future audit is required to determine whether improvements in care have been effected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):45-52 - PubMed
    1. Fam Pract. 1993 Sep;10(3):268-76 - PubMed
    1. Palliat Med. 1995 Oct;9(4):295-305 - PubMed
    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Sep;78(5):406-11 - PubMed
    1. Palliat Med. 1997 Sep;11(5):399-406 - PubMed

Publication types