[Acetabular reconstruction using acetabular reinforcement rings]
- PMID: 9697144
- DOI: 10.1007/pl00003508
[Acetabular reconstruction using acetabular reinforcement rings]
Abstract
Reviewing the literature the revision arthroplasty of the hip joint with acetabular reinforcement rings shows good results concerning a follow-up period of six years in comparison with cemented or non-cemented primary implants. We use different acetabular reinforcement rings with differentiated indications. The primary assignment is the secure fixation of the ring to the vital bone. The acetabular bone defect is filled with autogenous or homogeneous bone grafts. The increasing number of massive acetabular defects made us develop a new acetabular reinforcement ring. It allows a better fixation than the Burch-Schneider Ring and is cheaper than the individual acetabular implant. Since 1988 we performed 262 revision arthroplasty with acetabular reinforcement rings. Until 1996 we evaluated 174 reinforcement rings (41 Müller rings, 72 Ganz rings, 41 Burch-Schneider rings, 6 RS or RSH ring, 5 individual acetabular implants). After an average follow-up period of 5.6 years a radiological or clinical loosening of the acetabular component occurred in only 6 patients (3.4%). To reach a better comparison of the surgical results we developed a score, which differentiate checks the operative goals. On plane pelvic radiographs we checked the reconstruction of the rotation center, the demarcation of the acetabular component and the outcome of the bone transplant.
Similar articles
-
Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):561-571. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4142-1. Epub 2018 Sep 13. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30218182 Review.
-
Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.J Orthop Sci. 2010 Nov;15(6):764-71. doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-1549-y. Epub 2010 Nov 30. J Orthop Sci. 2010. PMID: 21116894
-
Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):543-548. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 28366746
-
THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3882-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 26245166 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of cages in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum: a systematic review.Acta Biomed. 2019 Jan 10;90(1-S):24-31. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i1-S.8081. Acta Biomed. 2019. PMID: 30714995 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
10-Year Survival of Acetabular Reinforcement Rings/Cages for Complex Hip Arthroplasty.Open Orthop J. 2015 May 15;9:163-7. doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010163. eCollection 2015. Open Orthop J. 2015. PMID: 26157533 Free PMC article.
-
[Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].Orthopade. 2010 Oct;39(10):931-41. doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1568-6. Orthopade. 2010. PMID: 20862576 German.
-
Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?Acta Orthop. 2017 Feb;88(1):35-40. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1248315. Epub 2016 Nov 28. Acta Orthop. 2017. PMID: 27892748 Free PMC article.
-
[Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].Orthopade. 2015 May;44(5):366-74. doi: 10.1007/s00132-015-3103-2. Orthopade. 2015. PMID: 25911603 German.
-
[What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].Orthopade. 2011 Dec;40(12):1084-94. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0. Orthopade. 2011. PMID: 22109589 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical