Subgroup and per-protocol analysis of the randomized European Trial on Isolated Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly
- PMID: 9701103
- DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.15.1681
Subgroup and per-protocol analysis of the randomized European Trial on Isolated Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly
Abstract
Background: In 1989, the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly started the double-blind, placebo-controlled, Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial to test the hypothesis that antihypertensive drug treatment would reduce the incidence of fatal and nonfatal stroke in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. This report addresses whether the benefit of antihypertensive treatment varied according to sex, previous cardiovascular complications, age, initial blood pressure (BP), and smoking or drinking habits in an intention-to-treat analysis and explores whether the morbidity and mortality results were consistent in a per-protocol analysis.
Methods: After stratification for center, sex, and cardiovascular complications, 4695 patients 60 years of age or older with a systolic BP of 160 to 219 mm Hg and diastolic BP less than 95 mm Hg were randomized. Active treatment consisted of nitrendipine (10-40 mg/d), with the possible addition of enalapril maleate (5-20 mg/d) and/or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg/d), titrated or combined to reduce the sitting systolic BP by at least 20 mm Hg, to below 150 mm Hg. In the control group, matching placebo tablets were employed similarly.
Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis, male sex, previous cardiovascular complications, older age, higher systolic BP, and smoking at randomization were positively and independently correlated with cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, for total (P = .009) and cardiovascular (P = .09) mortality, the benefit of antihypertensive drug treatment weakened with advancing age; for total mortality (P = .05), the benefit increased with higher systolic BP at entry, while for fatal and nonfatal stroke (P = .01), it was most evident in nonsmokers (92.5% of all patients). In the perprotocol analysis, active treatment reduced total mortality by 24% (P = .05), reduced all fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular end points by 32% (P<.001), reduced all strokes by 44% (P = .004), reduced nonfatal strokes by 48% (P = .005), and reduced all cardiac end points, including sudden death, by 26% (P = .05).
Conclusions: In elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, stepwise antihypertensive drug treatment, starting with the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker nitrendipine, improves prognosis. The per-protocol analysis suggested that treating 1000 patients for 5 years would prevent 24 deaths, 54 major cardiovascular end points, 29 strokes, or 25 cardiac end points. The effects of antihypertensive drug treatment on total and cardiovascular mortality may be attenuated in very old patients.
Similar articles
-
Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.Lancet. 1997 Sep 13;350(9080):757-64. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)05381-6. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 9297994 Clinical Trial.
-
Chinese trial on isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) Collaborative Group.Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jan 24;160(2):211-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.2.211. Arch Intern Med. 2000. PMID: 10647760 Clinical Trial.
-
Dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers for antihypertensive treatment in older patients--evidence from the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial.S Afr Med J. 2001 Dec;91(12):1060-8. S Afr Med J. 2001. PMID: 11845604 Clinical Trial.
-
Implications of the Systolic Hypertension in China trial.Clin Exp Hypertens. 1999 Jul-Aug;21(5-6):499-505. doi: 10.3109/10641969909060983. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1999. PMID: 10423076 Review.
-
Isolated systolic hypertension: pathophysiology, consequences and therapeutic benefits.J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Sep;12(9):621-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000676. J Hum Hypertens. 1998. PMID: 9783491 Review.
Cited by
-
Elderly hypertensives: how are they different?J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Nov;14(11):779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00703.x. Epub 2012 Aug 24. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012. PMID: 23126350 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment of diabetic patients with hypertension.Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999 Jun;1(3):225-31. doi: 10.1007/s11906-999-0025-6. Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999. PMID: 10981070 Review.
-
Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in adults 60 years or older.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 5;6(6):CD000028. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000028.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31167038 Free PMC article.
-
[Hypertension in the elderly and health global results with different pharmacological therapies].Aten Primaria. 2000 Nov 15;26(8):533-41. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78718-x. Aten Primaria. 2000. PMID: 11149186 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Risk of hospitalized and non-hospitalized gastrointestinal bleeding in ALLHAT trial participants receiving diuretic, ACE-inhibitor, or calcium-channel blocker.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260107. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34793552 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical