Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain--some predictors of success. A 15-year experience
- PMID: 9701116
- DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(98)00012-3
Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain--some predictors of success. A 15-year experience
Abstract
Background: We have used epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for pain control for the past 15 years. An analysis of our series of 235 patients has clarified the value of specific prognostic parameters in the prediction of successful SCS.
Methods: Patients were followed up for periods ranging from 6 months to 15 years with a mean follow-up of 66 months. The mean age of the 150 men and 85 women in the study was 51.4 years. Indications for SCS included failed back syndrome (114 patients), peripheral vascular disease (39 patients), peripheral neuropathy (30 patients), multiple sclerosis (13 patients), reflex sympathetic dystrophy (13 patients), and other etiologies of chronic intractable pain (26 patients).
Results: One hundred and eighty-nine patients received permanent devices; 111 (59%) of these patients continue to receive satisfactory pain relief. Pain attributable to failed back syndrome, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, peripheral vascular disease of lower limbs, multiple sclerosis, and peripheral neuropathy responded favorably to spinal cord stimulation. In contrast, paraplegic pain, cauda equina syndrome, stump pain, phantom limb pain, and primary bone and joint disease pain did not respond as well. Cases of cauda equina injury had promising initial pain relief, but gradually declined after a few years. After long-term follow-up, 47 of the 111 successfully implanted patients were gainfully employed, compared with 22 patients before implantation. The successful patients reported improvements in daily living as well as a decrease in analgesic usage. Multipolar stimulation systems were significantly more reliable (p < 0.001) than unipolar systems. Complications included hardware malfunction, electrode displacement, infection, and tolerance.
Conclusion: Aside from etiologies of pain syndromes as a prognostic factor, we have identified other parameters of success. In patients who have undergone previous surgical procedures, the shorter the duration of time to implantation, the greater the rate of success (p < 0.001). The diagnosis of failed back syndrome must be considered a confounding factor in our analysis. Those patients whose pain did not follow a surgical procedure had better responses to SCS than patients who had multiple surgical procedures prior to their first implant. The advent of multipolar systems has significantly improved clinical reliability over unipolar systems. Age, sex, and laterality of pain did not prove to be of significance.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of chronic pain by epidural spinal cord stimulation: a 10-year experience.J Neurosurg. 1991 Sep;75(3):402-7. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.3.0402. J Neurosurg. 1991. PMID: 1869942
-
Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience.Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3):481-96; discussion 481-96. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000192162.99567.96. Neurosurgery. 2006. PMID: 16528188
-
The treatment of chronic pain by epidural spinal cord stimulation--a 15 year follow up; present status.Axone. 1997 Jun;18(4):71-3. Axone. 1997. PMID: 9295480
-
Deep brain stimulation for intractable pain: a 15-year experience.Neurosurgery. 1997 Apr;40(4):736-46; discussion 746-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199704000-00015. Neurosurgery. 1997. PMID: 9092847 Review.
-
Neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord in the treatment of chronic intractable neck and upper extremity pain: a case series and review of the literature.Pain Physician. 2007 Mar;10(2):305-11. Pain Physician. 2007. PMID: 17387353 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.PLoS One. 2014 Dec 23;9(12):e114938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114938. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25536035 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Historical and present state of neuromodulation in chronic pain.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014 Jan;18(1):387. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0387-y. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014. PMID: 24338734 Review.
-
Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain following traumatic spinal cord injury: a case report.Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2022 Sep 15;8(1):80. doi: 10.1038/s41394-022-00546-2. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2022. PMID: 36109507 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of novel spinal cord stimulation modes for complex regional pain syndrome.Can J Pain. 2019 Mar 5;3(1):33-48. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2019.1574536. eCollection 2019. Can J Pain. 2019. PMID: 35005392 Free PMC article.
-
Successful application of burst spinal cord stimulation for refractory upper limb pain: a case series.J Int Med Res. 2021 Mar;49(3):3000605211004035. doi: 10.1177/03000605211004035. J Int Med Res. 2021. PMID: 33788644 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous