Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Aug;78(3):328-35.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.494.

Comparison of the cytotoxic activity of melphalan with L-prolyl-m-L-sarcolysyl-L-p-fluorophenylalanine in human tumour cell lines and primary cultures of tumour cells from patients

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Comparison of the cytotoxic activity of melphalan with L-prolyl-m-L-sarcolysyl-L-p-fluorophenylalanine in human tumour cell lines and primary cultures of tumour cells from patients

R Larsson et al. Br J Cancer. 1998 Aug.
Free PMC article

Abstract

m-L-sarcolysin (m-L-SL) is an isomer of melphalan (Mel) with the di(2-chloroethyl) amino group being substituted in the meta position of phenylalanine. By covalent conjugation of amino acids to m-L-SL, a peptide complex consisting of six m-L-SL-based oligopeptides known as peptichemio (PTC) was developed previously. In the present study, the cytotoxic activity pattern of the different oligopeptides of PTC was investigated in ten human tumour cell lines representing different mechanisms of cytotoxic drug resistance using the fluorometric microculture cytotoxicity assay (FMCA). In the cell line panel, L-prolyl-m-L-sarcolysyl-L-p-fluorophenylalanine (P2) was the most active oligopeptide, showing slightly lower mean IC50 values (2.6 vs 3.9 and 4.1 microg ml(-1)) than Mel and m-L-SL. The other five oligopeptides were less active than Mel. All active oligopeptides showed mechanistic similarity to Mel as judged by the correlation analysis of the cell line panel log IC50 values (R > or = 0.90), although P2 appeared to be less sensitive to GSH-mediated drug resistance. The relative activity of Mel and P2 was found to be related to degree of proliferation, P2 being more active towards low-proliferating cell lines. P2 and Mel were then further characterized in 49 fresh human tumour samples. In these samples P2 was considerably more active than Mel and showed a higher relative solid tumour activity (2.7 to 4.5-fold). However, the correlation of log IC50s between P2 and Mel in patient cells was high (R = 0.79), indicating a similar mechanism of action in this tumour model too. Cross-resistance with other standard drugs was lower for P2 than Mel. The results show that P2 is the most potent component of PTC and demonstrates a favourable activity profile compared with Mel. These data suggest that further investigation of P2 as a potential anti-tumour agent is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Clin Pharmacol. 1974 Oct;10(3):190-202 - PubMed
    1. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother. 1991;8(4):265-9 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1982;8(1):9-16 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1984;12(2):70-6 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Jan;69(1):17-20 - PubMed

Publication types