Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998;6(4):270-82.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<270::AID-HBM6>3.0.CO;2-0.

The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging--validation study with functional MRI

Affiliations

The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging--validation study with functional MRI

G Bush et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998.

Abstract

The anterior cingulate cortex has been activated by color Stroop tasks, supporting the hypothesis that it is recruited to mediate response selection or allocate attentional resources when confronted with competing information-processing streams. The current study used the newly developed "Counting Stroop" to identify the mediating neural substrate of cognitive interference. The Counting Stroop, a Stroop variant allowing on-line response time measurements while obviating speech, was created because speaking produces head movements that can exceed those tolerated by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), preventing the collection of vital performance data. During this task, subjects report by button-press the number of words (1-4) on the screen, regardless of word meaning. Interference trials contain number words that are incongruent with the correct response (e.g., "two" written three times), while neutral trials contain single semantic category common animals (e.g., "bird"). Nine normal right-handed adult volunteers underwent fMRI while performing the Counting Stroop. Group fMRI data revealed significant (P < or = 10(-4) activity in the cognitive division of anterior cingulate cortex when contrasting the interference vs. neutral conditions. On-line performance data showed 1) longer reaction times for interference blocks than for neutral ones, and 2) decreasing reaction times with practice during interference trials (diminished interference effects), indicating that learning occurred. The performance data proved to be a useful guide in analyzing the image data. The relative difference in anterior cingulate activity between the interference and neutral conditions decreased as subjects learned the task. These findings have ramifications for attentional, cognitive interference, learning, and motor control mechanism theories.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abdullaev YG, Posner MI (1997): Time course of activating brain areas in generating verbal associations. Psychol Sci 8: 56–59.
    1. Adams JA (1987): Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychol Bull 101: 41–74.
    1. Bates JF, Goldman‐Rakic PS (1993): Prefrontal connections of medial motor areas in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 336: 211–228. - PubMed
    1. Bench CJ, Frith CD, Grasby PM, Friston KJ, Paulesu E, Frackowiak RSJ, Dolan RJ (1993): Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia 31: 907–922. - PubMed
    1. Benes FM (1993): Relationship of cingulate cortex to schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders In: Vogt BA, Gabriel M. (eds): Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus: A Comprehensive Handbook. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp 581–605.

Publication types