Multifetal pregnancy reduction is not associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction, except for very-high-order multiples
- PMID: 9704791
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70276-5
Multifetal pregnancy reduction is not associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction, except for very-high-order multiples
Abstract
Objective: Our purpose was to investigate whether multifetal pregnancies reduced to twins have an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction and discordant birth weight.
Study design: This retrospective cohort study investigated the rates of birth weight discordance > 20% and intrauterine growth restriction using both twin and singleton birth weight curves in 441 twin deliveries after multifetal pregnancy reduction (233 reduced from triplets, 156 from quadruplets, and 52 from quintuplets or greater) compared with 136 nonreduced dichorionic twins.
Results: No significant difference was found in the frequency of birth weight discordance and in the overall incidence of intrauterine growth restriction by both twin and singleton birth weight curves when pregnancies that underwent multifetal pregnancy reduction were compared with the control group. There was, however, an almost twofold increase in the rate of intrauterine growth restriction in pregnancies with a starting fetal number of 5 or more (23.1%) compared with that in those reduced from triplets or quadruplets (12.1%) when the twin curve standard was used (P = .03). This difference disappeared when these groups were compared with a singleton nomogram.
Conclusion: This study suggests that multifetal pregnancy reduction is not associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction unless the starting fetal number is > or = 5. This finding provides a further rationale to avoid transferring excessive numbers of preembryos after in vitro fertilization.
Similar articles
-
Multifetal pregnancy reduction: evaluation of fetal growth in the remaining twins.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;174(4):1233-8; discussion 1238-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70666-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8623851
-
Multifetal reduction increases the risk of preterm delivery and fetal growth restriction in twins: a case-control study.Fertil Steril. 1997 Jan;67(1):30-3. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81851-1. Fertil Steril. 1997. PMID: 8986679
-
Comparing pregnancy outcomes and loss rates in elective twin pregnancy reduction with ongoing twin gestations in a large contemporary cohort.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):253.e1-253.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30995460
-
Expectant management versus multifetal pregnancy reduction in higher order multiple pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair and a review of the literature.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(6):1167-1173. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4145-3. Epub 2016 Jul 5. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 27380181 Review.
-
Multifetal pregnancy reduction: a review of the world results for the period 1993-1996.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Dec;75(2):183-90. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00132-2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997. PMID: 9447372 Review.
Cited by
-
Mature Follicle Count and Multiple Gestation Risk Based on Patient Age in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles With Ovarian Stimulation.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1005-1014. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003795. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32282611 Free PMC article.
-
What are the risks of the assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and how can they be minimized?Reprod Med Biol. 2013 Jun 11;12(4):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s12522-013-0156-y. eCollection 2013 Oct. Reprod Med Biol. 2013. PMID: 29699141 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical