Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. A retrospective analysis of 94 cases
- PMID: 9706519
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. A retrospective analysis of 94 cases
Abstract
Methods: A retrospective analysis evaluating 94 patients who underwent posterior rectopexy in 48 patients (51%), resection with or without rectopexy in 19 patients (20%) and Delorme's procedure in 27 patients (29%) was carried out for rectal prolapse in the last 15 years. The surgical procedures are described in detail. Postoperative evaluation was possible in all patients and mean observation time was 3.2 years.
Results: Mortality rate was zero. Recurrence was seen in 4 cases (4.2%), only after Delorme's procedures. The proportion of continent patients increased from 69.2% preoperatively to 91.6% postoperatively. Defecation difficulties and incomplete evacuation did not change beneficially after the surgery. Important postoperative complications, retrograde ejaculation and impotence were seen in 5 male patients (17.2) after posterior rectopexy, and were a major cause of dissatisfaction.
Conclusions: In conclusion, Delorme's procedure, posterior rectopexy and resection procedures are effective surgical operations for treatment of rectal prolapse but extensive pelvic dissection during the posterior rectopexy may create serious sexual problems in male patients.
Similar articles
-
Long-term results of Delorme's procedure and Orr-Loygue rectopexy to treat complete rectal prolapse.Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Sep;48(9):1785-90. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0088-7. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005. PMID: 15981056
-
Long-term functional outcomes after laparoscopic and open rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse.Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1597-604. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9365-6. Epub 2008 Aug 29. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18758861
-
[Rehn-Delorme operation in pelvic floor insufficiency].Zentralbl Chir. 1996;121(8):692-7. Zentralbl Chir. 1996. PMID: 8967218 German.
-
[Rectal prolapse--choice of procedure and minimal invasive possibilities].Chirurg. 1996 May;67(5):471-82. Chirurg. 1996. PMID: 8777876 Review. German.
-
Gastroenterological options in faecal incontinence.Ann Chir. 1991;45(7):590-8. Ann Chir. 1991. PMID: 1755625 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases.Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Apr;19(4):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1255-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11. Tech Coloproctol. 2015. PMID: 25577276
-
Rectal prolapse: review according to the personal experience.J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011 Jun;27(3):107-13. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.3.107. Epub 2011 Jun 30. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011. PMID: 21829764 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic posterior rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: Is it the ideal procedure for males?J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun;18(2):295-301. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_323_20. J Minim Access Surg. 2022. PMID: 35313438 Free PMC article.
-
Rectal prolapse.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011 Mar;24(1):39-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272822. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011. PMID: 22379404 Free PMC article.
-
A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy.J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jan;10(1):18-22. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.124456. J Minim Access Surg. 2014. PMID: 24501504 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical