Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Aug 18;95(17):10015-9.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10015.

Mutation frequency declines during spermatogenesis in young mice but increases in old mice

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Mutation frequency declines during spermatogenesis in young mice but increases in old mice

C A Walter et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Five percent of live-born human offspring will have a genetic disorder. Of these, 20% are because of germ-line de novo mutations. Several genetic diseases, such as neurofibromatosis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, are associated with a high percentage of de novo germ-line mutations. Until recently, a direct analysis of spontaneous mutation frequencies in mammalian germ cells has been prevented by technical limitations. We have measured spontaneous mutation frequencies in a lacI transgene by using enriched populations of specific spermatogenic cell types. Similar to previously published results, we observed a lower mutation frequency for seminiferous tubule cell preparations, which contain all stages of spermatogenesis, relative to somatic tissues. We made the unexpected observation of a decline in mutation frequency during spermatogenesis, such that the mutation frequencies of type B spermatogonia and all subsequent stages of spermatogenesis are lower than the frequency for primitive type A spermatogonia. In addition, spermatogenic cells from old mice have significantly increased mutation frequencies compared with spermatogenic cells from young or middle-aged mice. Finally, the mutation frequency was observed to increase during spermiogenesis in postreplicative cell types when spermatogenic cells were obtained from old mice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mutation frequencies and standard errors in somatic cells/tissues and enriched seminiferous tubule cell preparations obtained from 60-day-old male mice. The mutation frequencies are significantly lower for seminiferous tubule cells versus somatic cells (P ≤ 0.0001). A test for differences between brain, liver, Sertoli cells (6 days old), and Sertoli cells (8 days old) revealed no significant differences (P = 0.1094). Br, brain; Li, liver; SC, Sertoli cells; SAvg, somatic average; STC, seminiferous tubule cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mutation frequencies and standard errors for specific spermatogenic cell types. All cell types tested had a significantly lower mutation frequency than the average somatic mutation frequency (P ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant decline in mutation frequency during spermatogenesis between primitive type A spermatogonia and type B spermatogonia (P = 0.02). Prim. A, primitive type A spermatogonia; A, type A spermatogonia; B, type B spermatogonia; Pre-L, preleptotene spermatocytes; L+Z, leptotene plus zygotene spermatocytes; Pach., pachytene spermatocytes; Rnd., round spermatids; Sprm, spermatozoa.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Spontaneous mutation frequencies and standard errors are shown for spermatogenic cells obtained from 60-day-old, 15-month-old, and 28-month-old mice. The mutation frequency of old pachytene spermatocytes is greater than that of young spermatocytes (P < 0.0001) and greater than middle-aged pachytene spermatocytes (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mutation frequency of old round spermatids is greater than young (P < 0.0001) and middle-aged (P < 0.0001) round spermatids. Furthermore, the mutation frequency of old spermatozoa is greater than that of young spermatozoa (P < 0.0001). The mutation frequency was greater in old spermatozoa than in old pachytene spermatocytes (P = 0.0314), but there were no significant differences among young pachytene spermatocytes, round spermatids, and spermatozoa (P = 0.4585). Y. Pach., young pachytene spermatocytes; Y. Rnd., young round spermatids; Y. Sprm., young spermatozoa; M. Pach., middle-aged pachytene spermatocytes; M. Rnd., middle-aged round spermatids; O. Pach., old pachytene spermatocytes; O. Rnd., old round spermatids; O. Sprm., old spermatozoa.

References

    1. Kohler S W, Provost G S, Fieck A, Kretz P L, Bullock W O, Sorge J A, Putman D L, Short J M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:7958–7962. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nishino H, Buettner V L, Haavik J, Schaid D J, Sommer S S. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1996;28:299–312. - PubMed
    1. Douglas G R, Gingerich J D, Gossen J A, Bartlett S A. Mutagenesis. 1994;9:451–458. - PubMed
    1. Bellve A R, Cavicchia J C, Millete C F, O’Brien D A, Bhatnagar Y M, Dym M. J Cell Biol. 1977;74:68–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romrell L J, Bellve A R, Fawcett D W. Dev Biol. 1976;49:119–131. - PubMed

Publication types