Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation
- PMID: 9708750
Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation
Abstract
Background: A previous randomised study suggested that the progestagen, levonorgestrel, given alone in two separate doses each of 0.75 mg caused nausea and vomiting in fewer women and might be more effective than the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception, although the difference was not significant. We compared these two regimens when started within 72 h of unprotected coitus.
Methods: We enrolled in the double-blind, randomised trial 1998 women at 21 centres worldwide. Women with regular menses, not using hormonal contraception, and requesting emergency contraception after one unprotected coitus, received levonorgestrel (0.75 mg, repeated 12 h later) or the Yuzpe regimen (ethinyloestradiol 100 microg plus levonorgestrel 0.5 mg, repeated 12 h later).
Findings: Outcome was unknown for 43 women (25 assigned levonorgestrel, 18 assigned Yuzpe regimen). Among the remaining 1955 women, the crude pregnancy rate was 1.1% (11/976) in the levonorgestrel group compared with 3.2% (31/979) in the Yuzpe regimen group. The crude relative risk of pregnancy for levonorgestrel compared with the Yuzpe regimen was 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.70). The proportion of pregnancies prevented (compared with the expected number without treatment) was 85% (74-93) with the levonorgestrel regimen and 57% (39-71) with the Yuzpe regimen. Nausea (23.1 vs 50.5%) and vomiting (5.6 vs 18.8%) were significantly less frequent with the levonorgestrel regimen than with the Yuzpe regimen (p<0.01). The efficacy of both treatments declined with increasing time since unprotected coitus (p=0.01).
Interpretation: The levonorgestrel regimen was better tolerated and more effective than the current standard in hormonal emergency contraception. With either regimen, the earlier the treatment is given, the more effective it seems to be.
Comment in
-
Time for emergency contraception with levonorgestrel alone.Lancet. 1998 Aug 8;352(9126):416-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)22032-0. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9708743
-
Emergency contraception: WHO Task Force study.Lancet. 1998 Oct 10;352(9135):1222-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60561-2. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9777862 No abstract available.
-
Emergency contraception: WHO Task Force study.Lancet. 1998 Oct 10;352(9135):1223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60562-4. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9777863 No abstract available.
-
Emergency contraception.Lancet. 1998 Oct 31;352(9138):1477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61309-8. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9808025 No abstract available.
-
Emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or the Yuzpe regimen. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1939. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60440-0. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9863822 No abstract available.
-
Emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or the Yuzpe regimen.Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1939-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60441-2. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9863823
-
Timing of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or the Yuzpe regimen. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.Lancet. 1999 Feb 27;353(9154):721. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)05718-3. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10073517 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical