Acceptance and feasibility of peripheral stem cell mobilisation compared to bone marrow collection from healthy unrelated donors
- PMID: 9712488
Acceptance and feasibility of peripheral stem cell mobilisation compared to bone marrow collection from healthy unrelated donors
Abstract
Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation leads to an earlier engraftment compared to BMT. The feasibility, acceptance and long-term side-effects of G-CSF mobilisation of PBSC in unrelated healthy donors needs to be evaluated. Forty unrelated healthy donors received G-CSF in a dose of 10 microg/kg bodyweight for 5 days and two aphereses were performed. The donors were monitored prospectively. The data were compared to bone marrow harvests from unrelated donors. Almost all stem cell donors reported some side-effects due to Filgrastim application. Bone pain (32), headache (20), chest pain (two) and night sweats (one) were complained of. By taking analgesics, the pain was relieved in most cases. No donor discontinued the filgrastim application. Bone pain and headache resolved within 2-4 days after termination of Filgrastim application. There was, as expected, a seven-fold increase in the number of total WBCs. There were no significant changes of platelet counts during G-CSF application. After 4 weeks haemoglobin concentration and platelet counts showed no significant differences compared to baseline values. The aphereses were mostly tolerated very well. Eighteen donors reported paraesthesia, one donor developed dizziness, two complained of nausea and vomiting. There was a significant decrease in platelet count (242 before, 98 x 10(9)/l after aphereses). Autologous platelets were transfused after the second aphereses in four donors. These data were compared to data from 245 unrelated bone marrow donors, who had on average, 14 days bone pain and tiredness after donation. The G-CSF mobilisation and apheresis of peripheral blood stem cells is an alternative to traditional bone marrow harvesting in unrelated healthy donors. It is well tolerated and the duration of side-effects on average is shorter than after the surgical procedure. So far no long-term effects have been observed in the follow-up.
Similar articles
-
[Collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells from healthy donors].Acta Med Croatica. 2009 Jun;63(3):237-44. Acta Med Croatica. 2009. PMID: 19827352 Review. Croatian.
-
Mobilization and collection of PBSC in healthy donors: a retrospective analysis of the Italian Bone Marrow Transplantation Group (GITMO).Haematologica. 1997 Jan-Feb;82(1):47-52. Haematologica. 1997. PMID: 9107082
-
Efficacy and toxicity of a high-dose G-CSF schedule for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in healthy donors.Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Dec;24(12):1273-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702073. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999. PMID: 10627634 Clinical Trial.
-
Mobilization and collection of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells for transplantation.Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Jun;21 Suppl 3:S21-4. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998. PMID: 9712487
-
Peripheral blood stem cell collection from G-CSF-stimulated unrelated donors for second transplant.Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Dec;22 Suppl 5:S41-5. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998. PMID: 9989889 Review.
Cited by
-
Recommendations for managing the donation of haematopoietic stem cells from related and unrelated donors for allogeneic transplantation.Blood Transfus. 2013 Apr;11(2):296-304. doi: 10.2450/2012.0083-12. Epub 2013 Jan 23. Blood Transfus. 2013. PMID: 23399364 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Donor Experiences of Second Marrow or Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection Mirror the First, but CD34+ Yields Are Less.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Jan;24(1):175-184. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 25. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018. PMID: 28958894 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical