Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Jun;53(6):483-9.
doi: 10.1136/thx.53.6.483.

Effect of endogenous nitric oxide inhibition on airway responsiveness to histamine and adenosine-5'-monophosphate in asthma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of endogenous nitric oxide inhibition on airway responsiveness to histamine and adenosine-5'-monophosphate in asthma

D A Taylor et al. Thorax. 1998 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Nitric oxide (NO) may be bronchoprotective in asthma, possibly due to a direct action on airway smooth muscle or through mast cell stabilisation. To investigate this the effects of two doses of nebulised NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a non-selective NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor, on exhaled NO levels and airway responsiveness to histamine, a direct smooth muscle spasmogen, and adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP), an indirect spasmogen which activates mast cells, were evaluated in patients with mild asthma.

Methods: The study consisted of two phases each with a double blind, randomised, crossover design. In phase 1, 15 subjects inhaled either L-NAME 54 mg or 0.9% saline 30 minutes before histamine challenge. Nine of these subjects were studied in a similar fashion but were also challenged with AMP. In phase 2, 13 subjects (eight from phase 1) performed the same protocol but inhaled L-NAME in a dose of 170 mg or 0.9% saline before being challenged with histamine and AMP.

Results: The mean (95% CI) reduction in exhaled NO levels after L-NAME 54 mg was 78% (66 to 90) but this did not alter airway responsiveness; the geometric mean (SE) concentration provoking a fall of 20% or more in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) after L-NAME and saline was 0.59 (1.26) and 0.81 (1.26) mg/ml, respectively, for histamine and 20.2 (1.7) and 17.2 (1.6) mg/ml, respectively, for AMP. In contrast, L-NAME 170 mg reduced NO levels to a similar extent (81% (95% CI 76 to 87)) but increased airway responsiveness by approximately one doubling dose to both spasmogens; the geometric mean (SE) PC20 for histamine after L-NAME 170 mg and saline was 0.82 (1.29) and 1.78 (1.19) mg/ml, respectively (p < 0.001), and for AMP was 11.8 (1.5) and 24.3 (1.4) mg/ml, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These results suggest that L-NAME increases airway responsiveness in asthma. This may occur through mechanisms separate from NO inhibition or through pathways independent of those responsible for production of NO measured in exhaled air.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Jun;83(6):1013-26 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 May;139(5):1192-7 - PubMed
    1. Pulm Pharmacol. 1992 Jun;5(2):97-102 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1993 Aug;92(2):736-42 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Sep;148(3):727-34 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms