Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 1998 Aug 29;317(7158):559-65.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7158.559.

A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult

B Towler  1 , L Irwig, P Glasziou, J Kewenter, D Weller, C Silagy
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult

B Towler et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To review effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult, and to consider benefits and harms of screening.

Design: Systematic review of trials of Hemoccult screening, with meta-analysis of results from the randomised controlled trials.

Subjects: Four randomised controlled trials and two non-randomised trials of about 330 000 and 113 000 people respectively aged >=40 years in five countries.

Main outcome measures: Meta-analysis of effects of screening on mortality from colorectal cancer.

Results: Quality of trial design was generally high, and screening resulted in a favourable shift in the stage distribution of colorectal cancers in the screening groups. Meta-analysis of mortality results from the four randomised controlled trials showed that those allocated to screening had a reduction in mortality from colorectal cancer of 16% (relative risk 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.77 to 0.93)). When adjusted for attendance for screening, this reduction was 23% (relative risk 0.77 (0.57 to 0.89)) for people actually screened. If a biennial Hemoccult screening programme were offered to 10 000 people and about two thirds attended for at least one Hemoccult test, 8.5 (3.6 to 13.5) deaths from colorectal cancer would be prevented over a period of 10 years.

Conclusion: Although benefits of screening are likely to outweigh harms for populations at high risk of colorectal cancer, more information is needed about the harmful effects of screening, the community's responses to screening, and costs of screening for different healthcare systems before widespread screening can be recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Effects of screening with Hemoccult on mortality from colorectal cancer (random effects model)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • ACP J Club. 1999 Jan-Feb;130(1):13

References

    1. Jeffs P, Coates M, Giles G, Shugg D, Threlfall T, Roder D, et al. Cancer in Australia 1989-1990 (with projections to 1995). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 1996. (Cancer Series No 5.)
    1. Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, Gao YT, Ferlay J, Powell J, editors. Cancer incidence in five continents. VI. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, International Association of Cancer Registries; 1992.
    1. Stewart Brown S, Farmer A. Screening could seriously damage your health. Decisions to screen must take account of the social and psychological costs. BMJ. 1997;314:533–534. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mulrow CD, Oxman AD, eds. Critical appraisal of studies. Cochrane Collaboration handbook [updated 9 December 1996]. Section 6. In: The Cochrane Library [database on disc and CD ROM]. Cochrane Collaboration; Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software; 1997. Updated quarterly.
    1. Lau J. Meta-analyst version 0.991. A program for the meta-analysis of 2 by 2 tables. Boston MA: New England Medical Center; 1997.