What are archaebacteria: life's third domain or monoderm prokaryotes related to gram-positive bacteria? A new proposal for the classification of prokaryotic organisms
- PMID: 9723910
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00978.x
What are archaebacteria: life's third domain or monoderm prokaryotes related to gram-positive bacteria? A new proposal for the classification of prokaryotic organisms
Abstract
The evolutionary relationship within prokaryotes is examined based on signature sequences (defined as conserved inserts or deletions shared by specific taxa) and phylogenies derived from different proteins. Archaebacteria are indicated as being monophyletic by a number of proteins related to the information transfer processes. In contrast, for several other highly conserved proteins, common signature sequences are present in archaebacteria and Gram-positive bacteria, whereas Gram-negative bacteria are indicated as being distinct. For these proteins, archaebacteria do not form a phylogenetically distinct clade but show polyphyletic branching within Gram-positive bacteria. A closer relationship of archaebacteria to Gram-positive bacteria in comparison with Gram-negative bacteria is generally seen for the majority of the available gene/ protein sequences. To account for these results and the fact that both archaebacteria and Gram-positive bacteria are prokaryotes surrounded by a single cell membrane, I propose that the primary division within prokaryotes is between monoderm prokaryotes (surrounded by a single membrane) and diderm prokaryotes (i.e. all true Gram-negative bacteria containing both an inner cytoplasmic membrane and an outer membrane). This proposal is consistent with both cell morphology and signature sequences in different proteins. The monophyletic nature of archaebacteria for some genes, and their polyphyletic branching within Gram-positive bacteria as suggested by others, is critically examined, and several explanations, including derivation of archaebacteria from Gram-positive bacteria in response to antibiotic selection pressure, are proposed. Signature sequences in proteins also indicate that the low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria are phylogenetically distinct from the high-G+C Gram-positive group and that the diderm prokaryotes (i.e. Gram-negative bacteria) appear to have evolved from the latter group. Protein phylogenies and signature sequences also show that all eukaryotic cells have received significant gene contributions from both an archaebacterium and a Gram-negative eubacterium. Thus, the hypothesis that archaebacteria and eukaryotes shared a common ancestor exclusive of eubacteria is not supported. These observations provide evidence for an alternate view of the evolutionary relationship among living organisms that is different from the currently popular three-domain proposal.
Comment in
-
Horizontal transfers confuse the prokaryotic phylogeny based on the HSP70 protein family.Mol Microbiol. 1999 Feb;31(3):1007-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01185.x. Mol Microbiol. 1999. PMID: 10048042 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Life's third domain (Archaea): an established fact or an endangered paradigm?Theor Popul Biol. 1998 Oct;54(2):91-104. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1376. Theor Popul Biol. 1998. PMID: 9733652 Review.
-
The natural evolutionary relationships among prokaryotes.Crit Rev Microbiol. 2000;26(2):111-31. doi: 10.1080/10408410091154219. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2000. PMID: 10890353 Review.
-
Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: A reappraisal of evolutionary relationships among archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes.Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Dec;62(4):1435-91. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1435-1491.1998. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998. PMID: 9841678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: evolutionary relationships within prokaryotes and between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1997 Jul;72(1):49-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1000278224701. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1997. PMID: 9296263
-
Phylogenetic analysis of 70 kD heat shock protein sequences suggests a chimeric origin for the eukaryotic cell nucleus.Curr Biol. 1994 Dec 1;4(12):1104-14. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00249-9. Curr Biol. 1994. PMID: 7704574
Cited by
-
Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria).Protoplasma. 2020 May;257(3):621-753. doi: 10.1007/s00709-019-01442-7. Epub 2020 Jan 3. Protoplasma. 2020. PMID: 31900730 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolutionary analysis by whole-genome comparisons.J Bacteriol. 2002 Apr;184(8):2260-72. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.8.2260-2272.2002. J Bacteriol. 2002. PMID: 11914358 Free PMC article.
-
Structural analysis of polarizing indels: an emerging consensus on the root of the tree of life.Biol Direct. 2009 Aug 25;4:30. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-4-30. Biol Direct. 2009. PMID: 19706177 Free PMC article.
-
The lipopolysaccharide export pathway in Escherichia coli: structure, organization and regulated assembly of the Lpt machinery.Mar Drugs. 2014 Feb 17;12(2):1023-42. doi: 10.3390/md12021023. Mar Drugs. 2014. PMID: 24549203 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria.Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012 Mar;76(1):66-112. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05011-11. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012. PMID: 22390973 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources