Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Sep;150(1):345-57.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.1.345.

Molecular evolution of two lineages of L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons in the california mouse, Peromyscus californicus

Affiliations

Molecular evolution of two lineages of L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons in the california mouse, Peromyscus californicus

N C Casavant et al. Genetics. 1998 Sep.

Abstract

The large number of L1 [long interspersed elements (LINE)-1] sequences found in the genome is due to the insertion of copies of the retrotransposon over evolutionary time. The majority of copies appear to be replicates of a few active, or "master" templates. A continual replacement of master templates over time gives rise to lineages distinguishable by their own unique set of shared-sequence variants. A previous analysis of L1 sequences in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus and P. leucopus, revealed two active L1 lineages, marked by different rates of evolution, whose most recent common ancestor predates the expansion of the Peromyscus species. Here we exploit lineage-specific, shared-sequence variants to reveal a paucity of Lineage 2 sequences in at least one species, P. californicus. The dearth of Lineage 2 copies in P. californicus suggests that Lineage 2 may have been unproductive until after the most recent common ancestor of P. californicus and P. maniculatus. We also show that Lineage 1 appears to have a higher rate of evolution in P. maniculatus relative to either P. californicus or P. leucopus. As a phylogenetic tool, L1 lineage-specific variants support a close affinity between P. californicus and P. eremicus relative to the other species examined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503-17 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1997 Oct;45(4):424-36 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jan 20;187(2):291-304 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1986 Jun 5-11;321(6070):625-8 - PubMed
    1. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;6(1):168-82 - PubMed

Publication types