Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Spring;30(1):97-111.

Falls risk factors in an acute-care setting: a retrospective study

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9726185

Falls risk factors in an acute-care setting: a retrospective study

B Stevenson et al. Can J Nurs Res. 1998 Spring.

Abstract

Research findings have been contradictory regarding risk factors for falls in the acute-care setting. Identification of factors that place individuals at risk of falling in this setting are a priority because falls result in high morbidity and mortality and thus increased healthcare costs. The purpose of this study was to extend knowledge beyond the known risk factors of age and medical diagnosis by comparing the characteristics of 301 adults who fell while hospitalized with a matched sample of adults who did not fall while hospitalized. A descriptive, retrospective, comparative design was used. The fall and non-fall group were matched on age and primary medical diagnosis at the time of discharge. Data were collected from hospital incident reports and medical records. Logistic regression for matched groups identified 5 risk factors, as follows. Incontinence. The odds of falling were 11.3 (CI = 3.85, 33.05) times greater for those who were incontinent than for those who were not incontinent. Long hospital stay. The odds of falling were 9.9 (CI = 4.89, 19.88) times greater for those hospitalized 19 days or longer than for those hospitalized less than 19 days. Dependency for ambulation. The odds of falling were 6 (CI = 2.83, 12.84) times greater for those who were dependent for ambulation than for those who were independent. Independency for hygiene. The odds of falling were 2.5 (CI = 1.23, 4.88) times greater for those who were independent for hygiene than for those who were dependent. Lack of regular exercise. The odds of falling were twice as high (CI = 1.00, 3.82) for those who did not exercise regularly as for those who exercised regularly. These findings suggest that ongoing assessment may be more important than the admission assessment in identifying risk factors for falls in the acute-care setting. No 2 studies have found exactly the same set of risk factors, although some findings are consistent across studies. This suggests that those risk factors that are consistent across studies may identify persons who are at the greatest risk for falls and that other risk factors for falls are specific to a patient population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Predicting fall risk.
    Morse JM. Morse JM. Can J Nurs Res. 1998 Summer;30(2):11-2. Can J Nurs Res. 1998. PMID: 9807285 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources