Characterization of the enzymatic domains in the modular polyketide synthase involved in rifamycin B biosynthesis by Amycolatopsis mediterranei

Abstract

Five clustered polyketide synthase (PKS) genes, rifA-rifE, involved in rifamycin (Rf) biosynthesis in Amycolatopsis mediterranei S699 have been cloned and sequenced (August, P.R. et al., 1998. Chem. Biol. 5, 69-79). The five multifunctional polypeptides constitute a type I modular PKS that contains ten modules, each responsible for a specific round of polyketide chain elongation. Sequence comparisons of the Rf PKS proteins with other prokaryotic modular PKSs elucidated the regions that have an important role in enzyme activity and specificity. The beta-ketoacyl:acyl carrier protein synthase (KS) domains show the highest degree of similarity between themselves (86-90%) and to other PKSs (78-85%) among all the constituent domains. Both malonyl-coenzyme A (MCoA) and methylmalonyl-coenzyme A (mMCoA) are substrates for chain elongation steps carried out by the Rf PKS. Since acyltransferase (AT) domains of modular PKSs can distinguish between these two substrates, comparison of the sequence of all ten AT domains of the Rf PKS with those found in the erythromycin (Er) (Donadio, S. and Katz, L., 1992. Gene 111, 51-60) and rapamycin (Rp) (Haydock, S. et al., 1995. FEBS Lett. 374, 246-248) PKSs revealed that the AT domains in module 2 of RifA and module 9 of RifE are specific for MCoA, whereas the other eight modules specify mMCoA. Dehydration of the beta-hydroxyacylthioester intermediates should occur during the reactions catalysed by module 4 of RifB and modules 9 and 10 of RifE, yet only the active site region of module 4 conforms closely to the dehydratase (DH) motifs in the Er and Rp PKSs. The DH domains of modules 9 and 10 diverge significantly from the consensus sequence defined by the Er and Rp PKSs, except for the active site His residues. Deletions in the DH active sites of module 1 in RifA and module 5 in RifB and in the N- and C-terminal regions of module 8 of RifD should inactivate these domains, and module 2 of RifA lacks a DH domain, all of which are consistent with the proposed biosynthesis of Rf. In contrast, module 6 of RifB and module 7 of RifC appear to contain intact DH domains even though DH activity is not apparently required in these modules. Module 2 of RifA lacks a beta-ketoacyl:acyl carrier protein reductase (KR) domain and the one in module 3 has an apparently inactive NADPH binding motif, similar to one found in the Er PKS, while the other eight KR domains of the Rf PKS should be functional. These observations are consistent with biosynthetic predictions. All the acyl carrier protein (ACP) domains, while clearly functional, nevertheless have active site signature sequences distinctive from those of the Er and Rp PKSs. Module 2 of RifA has only the core domains (KS, AT and ACP). The starter unit ligase (SUL) and ACP domains present in the N-terminus of RifA direct the selection and loading of the starter unit, 3-amino-5-hydroxybenzoic acid (AHBA), onto the PKS. AHBA is made by the products of several other genes in the Rf cluster through a variant of the shikimate pathway (August, P.R. et al., inter alia). RifF, produced by the gene immediately downstream of rifE, is thought to catalyse the intramolecular cyclization of the PKS product, thereby forming the ansamacrolide precursor of Rf B. 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.