First trimester ultrasound screening. Carries ethical and psychological implications
- PMID: 9732335
- PMCID: PMC1113870
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7160.694
First trimester ultrasound screening. Carries ethical and psychological implications
Comment in
-
Antenatal screening. Obtaining selective consent to scanning, rather than screening, is possible.BMJ. 1999 Mar 20;318(7186):805. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10082715 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Antenatal screening. Better understanding of factors influencing uptake is needed.BMJ. 1999 Mar 20;318(7186):805. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10215386 No abstract available.
-
Antenatal screening. Women are being given incomplete information.BMJ. 1999 Mar 20;318(7186):805-6. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10215387 No abstract available.
References
-
- Clement S, Wilson J, Sikorski J. Women’s experiences of antenatal ultrasound scans. In: Clement S, editor. Psychological perspectives on pregnancy and childbirth. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998.
-
- Economides DL, Braithwaite JM. First trimester ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:53–57. - PubMed
-
- Venn-Treloar J. Nuchal translucency: screening without consent. BMJ. 1998;316:1027. - PubMed
-
- Proud J, Murphy-Black T. Choice of a scan: how much information do women receive before ultrasound. Br J Midwifery. 1997;5:144–147.
-
- Marteau TM. Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: a review. Prenatal Diagnosis. 1995;15:1215–1226. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources