Influence of microdamage on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia
- PMID: 9737354
- DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00103-3
Influence of microdamage on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia
Abstract
The relationship between microdamage accumulation and bone fragility is not well understood. Previous work has demonstrated a positive relationship between microdamage and age in human cortical bone. Prior investigations have also demonstrated that fracture toughness decreases with age in the same bone. Based on these findings, the objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a decrease in fracture toughness can be attributed to an increase in microdamage density. Microdamage parameters (density, surface density, and average crack length) were measured from bone taken from the shaft of the human femur and tibia and correlated with results from fracture toughness tests of the same bone. Results indicated that there was a weak but significant inverse relationship between fracture toughness and microdamage parameters for tension loading of the femur. These findings suggest that in vivo microdamage observable at the transmitted light level (100x) plays a secondary role to other contributory factors to decreased fracture toughness with age. Results also indicate that this relationship depends on bone ductility that apparently differs between the femur and the tibia. This study, in addition to prior investigations, suggests that crack size (microscopic vs. submicroscopic) and crack origin or type (in vivo vs. stress induced de novo) may influence the relationship between microdamage and bone toughness.
Similar articles
-
The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia.Bone. 1997 Nov;21(5):453-9. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00173-7. Bone. 1997. PMID: 9356740
-
Resistance to crack growth in human cortical bone is greater in shear than in tension.J Biomech. 1996 Aug;29(8):1023-31. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)00009-7. J Biomech. 1996. PMID: 8817369
-
Fracture toughness is dependent on bone location--a study of the femoral neck, femoral shaft, and the tibial shaft.J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Mar 5;49(3):380-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(20000305)49:3<380::aid-jbm11>3.0.co;2-w. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000. PMID: 10602071
-
Bone microdamage, remodeling and bone fragility: how much damage is too much damage?Bonekey Rep. 2015 Mar 18;4:644. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2015.11. eCollection 2015. Bonekey Rep. 2015. PMID: 25848533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bone microdamage and skeletal fragility in osteoporotic and stress fractures.J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Jan;12(1):6-15. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.6. J Bone Miner Res. 1997. PMID: 9240720 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of recovery time and test conditions on viscoelastic measures of tensile damage in cortical bone.J Biomech. 2007;40(12):2731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Apr 5. J Biomech. 2007. PMID: 17412349 Free PMC article.
-
Rib biomechanical properties exhibit diagnostic potential for accurate ageing in forensic investigations.PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0176785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176785. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28520764 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalent role of porosity and osteonal area over mineralization heterogeneity in the fracture toughness of human cortical bone.J Biomech. 2016 Sep 6;49(13):2748-2755. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 15. J Biomech. 2016. PMID: 27344202 Free PMC article.
-
Diffuse damage accumulation in the fracture process zone of human cortical bone specimens and its influence on fracture toughness.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001 Sep;12(9):779-83. doi: 10.1023/a:1017916800421. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001. PMID: 15348224
-
Effects of fatigue induced damage on the longitudinal fracture resistance of cortical bone.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014 Jul;25(7):1661-70. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5213-5. Epub 2014 Apr 9. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014. PMID: 24715332
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical