Low-molecular-weight heparins in non-ST-segment elevation ischemia: the ESSENCE trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, in non-Q-wave Coronary Events
- PMID: 9737476
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00108-8
Low-molecular-weight heparins in non-ST-segment elevation ischemia: the ESSENCE trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, in non-Q-wave Coronary Events
Abstract
Combination antithrombotic therapy with heparin plus aspirin decreases the risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Compared with standard unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has a more predictable antithrombotic effect, is easier to administer, and does not require coagulation monitoring. At 176 hospitals in 3 continents, 3,171 patients with rest unstable angina or non-wave myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to either enoxaparin (a LMWH), 1 mg/kg twice daily subcutaneously, or to continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin, for a minimum of 48 hours to a maximum of 8 days. Trial medication was administered in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. At 14 days, the primary endpoint, the composite risk of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina with electrocardiographic changes or prompting intervention, was significantly lower in patients assigned to enoxaparin compared with heparin (16.6% vs 19.8%; odds ratio [OR] 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.49; p = 0.019). At 30 days, the composite risk of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina remained significantly lower in the enoxaparin group compared with the unfractionated heparin group (19.8% vs 23.3%, OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.0-1.46, p = 0.016). The rate of revascularization procedures at 30 days was also significantly lower in patients assigned to enoxaparin (27.1% vs 32.2%, p = 0.001). The 30-day incidence of major bleeding complication was 6.5% versus 7.0% (p = not significant), but the incidence of minor bleeding was significantly higher in the enoxaparin group (13.8% vs 8.8%, p <0.001) due primarily to injection-site ecchymosis. Thus, combination antithrombotic therapy with enoxaparin plus aspirin is more effective than unfractionated heparin plus aspirin in decreasing ischemic outcomes in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in the early (30 days) phase. The lower recurrent ischemic event rate seen with the LMWH, enoxaparin, is achieved without an increase in major bleeding, but with an increase in minor bleeding complications due mainly to injection-site ecchymosis.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group.N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 14;337(7):447-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199708143370702. N Engl J Med. 1997. PMID: 9250846 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective comparison of hemorrhagic complications after treatment with enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol. 2001 Dec 1;88(11):1230-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02082-3. Am J Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11728348 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized double-blind safety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with tirofiban and aspirin: the ACUTE II study. The Antithrombotic Combination Using Tirofiban and Enoxaparin.Am Heart J. 2002 Sep;144(3):470-7. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.126115. Am Heart J. 2002. PMID: 12228784 Clinical Trial.
-
Implications of the Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes-2 (OASIS-2) study and the results in the context of other trials.Am J Cardiol. 1999 Sep 2;84(5A):26M-31M. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00380-x. Am J Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 10505540 Review.
-
TIMI 11B. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Rationale, study design, and methods. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B Trial Investigators.Am Heart J. 1998 Jun;135(6 Pt 3 Su):S353-60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70265-0. Am Heart J. 1998. PMID: 9628449 Review.
Cited by
-
Multi-vessel coronary disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.Heart. 2004 Mar;90(3):341-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.018986. Heart. 2004. PMID: 14966067 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Anti-Xa activity of enoxaparin and nadroparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Exp Clin Cardiol. 2008 Winter;13(4):175-8. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 19343162 Free PMC article.
-
Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology.Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):2196-207. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0677-z. Epub 2007 Jun 5. Eur Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17549487 No abstract available.
-
The role of pharmacotherapy and catheter-based intervention in the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2002 Jul;4(4):260-71. doi: 10.1007/s11886-002-0061-1. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2002. PMID: 12052265 Review.
-
Anti-factor Xa kinetics after intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a population model analysis.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Oct;60(4):364-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02452.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005. PMID: 16187968 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical