Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Aug;176(2):208-11.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00121-4.

Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited

J R Smith  1 , M L Friedell, M L Cheatham, S P Martin, M J Cohen, J D Horowitz
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited

J R Smith et al. Am J Surg. 1998 Aug.

Abstract

Background: This study compares central venous catheters (CVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) for indications for insertion, complications, and economic impact.

Methods: A retrospective review of 838 (283 CVC, 555 PICC) consecutively placed venous catheters reflected 49,365 CVC and 11,814 PICC days.

Results: There were 57 (20%) complications in the CVC group, 197 (35%) complications in the PICC group. PICC were associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of catheter malfunction (P = 0.0005), arm vein phlebitis (P = 0.0004), and overall complications (P = 0.00001). A higher complication rate was noted in PICC inserted for chemotherapy (P = 0.00001) and parenteral hyperalimentation administration (P = 0.04). Charges for inpatient insertion of PICC and CVC were $500 and $2,500, respectively.

Conclusions: PICC have a significantly higher complication rate than CVC. PICC provide cost-effective central access of 2 to 3 weeks' duration, reserving operatively placed CVC for longer access requirements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources