Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Sep;113(3):386-93.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00671.x.

The murine buccal mucosa is an inductive site for priming class I-restricted CD8+ effector T cells in vivo

Affiliations

The murine buccal mucosa is an inductive site for priming class I-restricted CD8+ effector T cells in vivo

C Desvignes et al. Clin Exp Immunol. 1998 Sep.

Abstract

The present study shows that Langerhans cells of the buccal mucosa and the skin share a similar phenotype, including in situ expression of MHC class II, the mannose receptor DEC-205 and CD11c, and absence of the costimulatory molecules B7.1, B7.2 and CD40 as well as Fas. Application of 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) onto the buccal mucosa is associated with a rapid migration of dendritic cells (DC) to the epithelium and induction of B7.2 expression on some DC. Buccal sensitization with DNFB elicited a specific contact sensitivity (CS) in response to skin challenge, mediated by class I-restricted CD8+ effector T cells and down-regulated by class II-restricted CD4+ T cells, demonstrated by the lack of priming of class I-deficient mice and the enhanced response of class II-deficient mice, respectively. CS induced by buccal immunization is associated with priming of class I-restricted CD8+ effector T cells endowed with hapten-specific cytotoxic activity. Thus, the buccal epithelium is an inductive site, equivalent to the epidermis, for the generation of CS independent of CD4 help, and of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses mediated by class I-restricted CD8+ T cells. We propose that immunization through the buccal mucosa, which allows antigen presentation by epithelial DC efficient for priming systemic class I-restricted CD8+ CTL, may be a valuable approach for single-dose mucosal vaccination with subunit vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Immunohistochemical analysis of dendritic cells (DC) of the buccal and skin epithelium. Epithelial sheets from the buccal mucosa (a,b,c) and the skin (d,e,f) from BALB/c mice were stained with MoAbs specific for MHC class II (CD311) (a and d), CD11c (N418) (b and e) and the mannose receptor DEC-205 (NLDC-145) (c and f). Staining is exclusively observed on cells with dendritic morphology. (Final mag. × 400.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Up-regulation of B7.2 expression on dendritic cells (DC) after 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) application onto the buccal mucosa. Cryostat sections (5 μm thick) from the buccal mucosa of C57Bl/6 mice either untreated (a,b), or 2 h (c,d) or 24 h (e,f) after buccal sensitization with DNFB were stained for MHC class II (CD311) (a,c,e) or B7.2 (CD86, clone GL1) (b,d,f) molecule expression. Sections were counterstained with Harris haematoxylin. (Final mag. × 400.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dose–effect and kinetics of the contact sensitivity (CS) to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) generated by buccal or epicutaneous sensitization. BALB/c mice were sensitized by topical application on the buccal mucosa (a) or on abdominal skin (b) of 0.5% (▵), 1% (○) or 2% (□) of DNFB diluted in acetone:olive oil. Five days later all mice were challenged on the right ear with 0.2% DNFB. The skin CS response was evaluated by the increment in ear thickness at various days after challenge. The results (mean ± s.d.) are representative of one experiment out of three using six mice per group. Ear swelling was < 10 μm in unsensitized mice that were ear-challenged with DNFB and in DNFB-sensitized mice that were ear-challenged with the irrelevant hapten oxazolone (not shown).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Contact sensitivity (CS) induced by buccal immunization with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) is mediated by class I-restricted CD8+ effector T cells, independently of CD4+ T cells. (a) Heterozygote β2m+/° (•) or homozygote β2m°/° (○) mice and (b) heterozygote Aβ+/° (▪) or homozygote Aβ°/° (□) mice were buccally sensitized with 0.5% of DNFB and ear-challenged 5 days later with 0.2% DNFB. Ear swelling, expressed as mean ± s.d. of six mice per group, was determined at various time points after challenge. The data shown are representative of two to three experiments.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Buccal immunization can prime hapten-specific CD8+ T cells in vivo. Unfractionated T cells, CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were purified from C57Bl/6 mice spleens on day 5 after buccal sensitization with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and restimulated in vitro for 3 days in the presence of either unmodified, 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonate (DNBS)-modified or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonate (TNBS)-modified syngeneic spleen cells. T cell proliferation was determined by 3H-thymidine uptake over the last 6 h of culture. The result represents mean ± s.d. of quadruplicate wells and is representative of two experiments.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Buccal immunization induces specific class I-restricted CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). (a) Pooled spleen cells from either C57Bl/6 mice day 5 after buccal sensitization with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) were restimulated for 6 days with syngeneic 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonate (DNBS)-modified spleen cells. DNBS-specific CTL activity was determined by testing specific lysis of 51Cr EL-4 target cells that were either unmodified (•), DNBS-modified (▪) or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonate (TNBS)-modified (▴). (b) Pooled spleen cells from MHC class I-deficient mice β2m°/° (□,○), or β2m+/° heterozygote control (▪,•) mice were restimulated for 6 days with syngeneic DNBS-modified spleen. DNBS-specific CTL activity was determined by testing lysis of unmodified (○,•) or DNBS-modified (□,▪) 51Cr EL-4 target cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Butcher EC. The regulation of lymphocyte traffic. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1986;128:85–95. - PubMed
    1. Gowans JL, Knight EJ. The route of re-circulation of lymphocytes in the rat. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1964;159:257–3. - PubMed
    1. McDermott MR, Bienenstock J. Evidence for a common mucosal immunological system. I. Migration of B immunoblasts into intestinal, respiratory, and genital tissues. J Immunol. 1979;122:1892–7. - PubMed
    1. Barrett AW, Ross DA, Goodacre JA. Purified human oral Langerhans cells function as accessory cells in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol. 1993;92:158–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Wilsem EJG, Van Hoogstraten IMW, Brevé J, et al. Dendritic cells of the oral mucosa and the induction of oral tolerance. A local affair. Immunol. 1994;83:128–2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types