Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy
- PMID: 9740428
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1804
Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy
Abstract
A retrospective cohort study was set up to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy towards subsequent fertility. Consecutive patients undergoing conservative or radical surgery for tubal pregnancy between January 1990 and August 1993 in two university hospitals were included in the study. Outcome measures were spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and repeat ectopic pregnancy (EP). Of the 135 patients analysed, 56 underwent conservative surgery and 79 underwent radical surgery. Patients treated with conservative surgery achieved a higher 3-year cumulative pregnancy rate than those treated radically (P < 0.001, log-rank test). In patients treated conservatively, there was only one spontaneous IUP in the period between 18 months and 3 years after the tubal pregnancy. In contrast, patients treated radically continued to conceive in this period. Multivariate analysis showed a fecundity rate ratio (FRR) of 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91 to 3.8] for IUP after conservative surgery in the first 18 months of follow-up. In patients with a history of bilateral tubal disease the FRR was 3.1 (95% CI: 0.76 to 12), whereas in patients without a history of bilateral tubal disease the FRR was 1.4 (95% CI: 0.13 to 16). The FRR for repeat EP was 2.4 (95% CI: 0.57 to 11). Our data indicate a beneficial effect of conservative surgery towards subsequent fertility that was not, however, statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. In view of these inconclusive data and the importance of this major health problem, randomized studies are required to assess whether conservative surgery really improves the fertility prospects of patients with tubal pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. A review.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Jan;75(1):8-12. doi: 10.3109/00016349609033276. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996. PMID: 8561006 Review.
-
Fertility outcome analysis after surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 8;5(9):e007339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007339. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26351180 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility after radical surgery for tubal pregnancy.Fertil Steril. 1998 Oct;70(4):680-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00251-9. Fertil Steril. 1998. PMID: 9797098
-
Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial.Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1247-53. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det037. Epub 2013 Mar 12. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23482340 Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical treatment for tubal pregnancies.Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 May;176(5):519-26. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993. PMID: 8480279 Review.
Cited by
-
The Very First Romanian Unruptured 13-Weeks Gestation Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 25;58(9):1160. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091160. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36143837 Free PMC article.
-
The ESEP study: salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; the impact on future fertility: a randomised controlled trial.BMC Womens Health. 2008 Jun 26;8:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-8-11. BMC Womens Health. 2008. PMID: 18582372 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Tubal ectopic pregnancy.BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Apr 20;2009:1406. BMJ Clin Evid. 2009. PMID: 19445747 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD000324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000324.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17253448 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Mar 25;11(3):e0152343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152343. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27015601 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources