Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Sep 19;317(7161):788-91.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7161.788.

A multidisciplinary approach for improving services in primary care: randomised controlled trial of screening for haemoglobin disorders

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A multidisciplinary approach for improving services in primary care: randomised controlled trial of screening for haemoglobin disorders

M Modell et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of improving screening for carriers of haemoglobin disorders in general practice by using a nurse facilitator to work with primary care teams and the relevant haematology laboratories; to identify problems in communication between all those involved in delivering the service, and to implement solutions.

Design: Two year, practice based randomised controlled trial.

Setting: North London area where 29% of residents and 43% of births are in ethnic groups at risk for haemoglobin disorders.

Subjects: 26 of the 93 practices using the services of the area's haematology laboratory agreed to take part and were randomly divided into control and intervention practices.

Main outcome measure: Change in number of requests for screening tests for haemoglobin disorders made by control and intervention practices in baseline and intervention years.

Results: The number of screening tests requested varied from 0-150 in the 93 practices in the baseline year. Study practices tended to have made a moderate number of requests (10-50) during this period. During the intervention year intervention practices made 292 more requests (99% increase) and control practices made 74 fewer requests (23% decrease; P=0.001 for difference in median change). Four practices, three of which were singlehanded, accounted for 75% of the increase. The number of requests from intervention practices, adjusted for baseline requests, was 3.2 times higher than control practices (P<0.0001).

Conclusion: General practitioners and practice nurses are willing to undertake a new genetic screening service (or expand an existing one) if they are persuaded that it benefits the health of a significant proportion of their practice population. They need appropriate tools (for example, information materials for carriers and groups at risk), and the laboratory must be sensitive to their needs. Preconceptional carrier screening and counselling need to be coupled with antenatal screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Change in number of requests for screening for haemoglobin disorders in participating practices. Practices are ranked in order of the number of requests in the baseline year
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of doctors (including GP registrars) in intervention practices and proportion of total increase in requests for haemoglobinopathy screening

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Health. Report of a Working Party of the Standing Medical Advisory Committee on Sickle Cell, Thalassaemia and other Haemoglobinopathies. London: HMSO.; 1993.
    1. Health Education Authority. Sickle cell and thalassaemia: achieving health gain—guidance for commissioners and providers. London: HEA; 1998.
    1. British Society For Haematology. Guidelines for haemoglobinopathy screening. Clin Labor Haematol. 1988;10:87–94. - PubMed
    1. Angastiniotis MA, Kyriakidou S, Hadjiminas M. How thalassaemia was controlled in Cyprus. World Health Forum. 1986;7:291–297.
    1. Ostrowsky JT, Lippman A, Scriver CR. Cost-benefit analysis of a thalassemia disease prevention programme. Am J Public Health. 1985;75:732–736. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms