Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group
- PMID: 9742977
Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group
Erratum in
- Lancet 1998 Nov 7;352(9139):1558
Abstract
Background: In patients with type 2 diabetes, intensive blood-glucose control with insulin or sulphonylurea therapy decreases progression of microvascular disease and may also reduce the risk of heart attacks. This study investigated whether intensive glucose control with metformin has any specific advantage or disadvantage.
Methods: Of 4075 patients recruited to UKPDS in 15 centres, 1704 overweight (>120% ideal bodyweight) patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, mean age 53 years, had raised fasting plasma glucose (FPG; 6.1-15.0 mmol/L) without hyperglycaemic symptoms after 3 months' initial diet. 753 were included in a randomised controlled trial, median duration 10.7 years, of conventional policy, primarily with diet alone (n=411) versus intensive blood-glucose control policy with metformin, aiming for FPG below 6 mmol/L (n=342). A secondary analysis compared the 342 patients allocated metformin with 951 overweight patients allocated intensive blood-glucose control with chlorpropamide (n=265), glibenclamide (n=277), or insulin (n=409). The primary outcome measures were aggregates of any diabetes-related clinical endpoint, diabetes-related death, and all-cause mortality. In a supplementary randomised controlled trial, 537 non-overweight and overweight patients, mean age 59 years, who were already on maximum sulphonylurea therapy but had raised FPG (6.1-15.0 mmol/L) were allocated continuing sulphonylurea therapy alone (n=269) or addition of metformin (n=268).
Findings: Median glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was 7.4% in the metformin group compared with 8.0% in the conventional group. Patients allocated metformin, compared with the conventional group, had risk reductions of 32% (95% CI 13-47, p=0.002) for any diabetes-related endpoint, 42% for diabetes-related death (9-63, p=0.017), and 36% for all-cause mortality (9-55, p=0.011). Among patients allocated intensive blood-glucose control, metformin showed a greater effect than chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, or insulin for any diabetes-related endpoint (p=0.0034), all-cause mortality (p=0.021), and stroke (p=0.032). Early addition of metformin in sulphonylurea-treated patients was associated with an increased risk of diabetes-related death (96% increased risk [95% CI 2-275], p=0.039) compared with continued sulphonylurea alone. A combined analysis of the main and supplementary studies showed fewer metformin-allocated patients having diabetes-related endpoints (risk reduction 19% [2-33], p=0.033). Epidemiological assessment of the possible association of death from diabetes-related causes with the concurrent therapy of diabetes in 4416 patients did not show an increased risk in diabetes-related death in patients treated with a combination of sulphonylurea and metformin (risk reduction 5% [-33 to 32], p=0.78).
Interpretation: Since intensive glucose control with metformin appears to decrease the risk of diabetes-related endpoints in overweight diabetic patients, and is associated with less weight gain and fewer hypoglycaemic attacks than are insulin and sulphonylureas, it may be the first-line pharmacological therapy of choice in these patients.
Comment in
- ACP J Club. 1999 Jan-Feb;130(1):3
-
Some answers, more controversy, from UKPDS. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study.Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):832-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)22937-0. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9742972 No abstract available.
-
The UK Prospective Diabetes Study.Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1932; author reply 1934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)00090-7. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9863806 No abstract available.
-
The UK Prospective Diabetes Study.Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1932-3; author reply 1934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60422-9. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9863807 No abstract available.
-
The UK Prospective Diabetes Study.Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1933; author reply 1934. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60424-2. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9863809 No abstract available.
-
The UK Prospective Diabetes Study.Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1933; author reply 1934. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60425-4. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9863810 No abstract available.
-
The UK Prospective Diabetes Study.Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60427-8. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9863811 No abstract available.
-
Legacy effect of intensive glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes-the UKPDS.Lancet. 2024 Jul 13;404(10448):100-102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01395-3. Lancet. 2024. PMID: 39002982 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9742976 Clinical Trial.
-
United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). 13: Relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three years.BMJ. 1995 Jan 14;310(6972):83-8. BMJ. 1995. PMID: 7833731 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
UKPDS 26: Sulphonylurea failure in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients over six years. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.Diabet Med. 1998 Apr;15(4):297-303. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199804)15:4<297::AID-DIA572>3.0.CO;2-W. Diabet Med. 1998. PMID: 9585394 Clinical Trial.
-
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15099124 Review.
-
Oral antidiabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Drugs. 2005;65(3):385-411. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565030-00005. Drugs. 2005. PMID: 15669880 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of continuous glucose monitoring in diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk: an expert-based multidisciplinary Delphi consensus.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Aug 27;21(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01598-2. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022. PMID: 36030229 Free PMC article.
-
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin: an overview.Clin Sci (Lond). 2012 Mar;122(6):253-70. doi: 10.1042/CS20110386. Clin Sci (Lond). 2012. PMID: 22117616 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diabetic nephropathy and extracellular matrix.J Histochem Cytochem. 2012 Dec;60(12):976-86. doi: 10.1369/0022155412465073. Epub 2012 Oct 27. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012. PMID: 23103723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Enhanced glycemic control with combination therapy for type 2 diabetes in primary care.Diabetes Ther. 2011 Sep;2(3):162-77. doi: 10.1007/s13300-011-0006-z. Epub 2011 Aug 1. Diabetes Ther. 2011. PMID: 22127825 Free PMC article.
-
Remission of screen-detected metabolic syndrome and its determinants: an observational study.BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 13;12:778. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-778. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22971223 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical