Marginal adaptation of implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with gold cylinders
- PMID: 9743663
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1998.tb00187.x
Marginal adaptation of implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with gold cylinders
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to determine the mean marginal discrepancy of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with gold cylinders and cemented on implant abutments. These discrepancies were then compared with those measured previously for implant-supported ceramic crowns.
Materials and methods: Fifteen Nobel BioCare CeraOne abutments were connected to implant fixtures embedded in acrylic resin blocks. Marginal discrepancies were determined for gold cylinders, gold cylinders plus ceramic alloy (metal frameworks), completed metal-ceramic crowns, and cemented metal-ceramic crowns using a stereomicroscope equipped with a video camera linked to a computer. A Hotelling's T2 test (p < or = .05) was used to evaluate potential differences in mean marginal discrepancies among groups.
Results: The mean marginal discrepancies were: 1) gold cylinders, 7.56 +/- 2.73 microns; 2) metal frameworks, 6.21 +/- 1.34 microns; 3) metal-ceramic crowns, 11.06 +/- 3.21 microns; and 4) zinc-phosphate cemented crowns, 31.47 +/- 6.65 microns. No significant difference between gold cylinders and metal frameworks was found. Mean marginal discrepancies for metal-ceramic crowns were significantly greater than discrepancies for cast gold cylinders. Cemented-crown mean marginal discrepancy was significantly greater than all other means.
Conclusions: Cemented metal-ceramic crowns fabricated using proprietary gold cylinders exhibited well-fitting margins (31.47 microns).
Similar articles
-
Marginal discrepancy of all-ceramic crowns cemented on implant abutments.J Prosthodont. 1995 Sep;4(3):173-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1995.tb00336.x. J Prosthodont. 1995. PMID: 8603207
-
Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 May-Jun;14(3):369-78. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999. PMID: 10379110
-
Marginal discrepancy of ceramic crowns with redesigned implant components.J Prosthet Dent. 1996 May;75(5):540-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90460-6. J Prosthet Dent. 1996. PMID: 8709021
-
Comparison of technical, biological, and esthetic parameters of ceramic and metal-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jul;124(1):26-35.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Nov 18. J Prosthet Dent. 2020. PMID: 31753461
-
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:199-214. doi: 10.1111/clr.13306. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 30328190
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous