Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998;76(3):295-305.

Measurement and determinants of tuberculosis outcome in Karonga District, Malawi

Affiliations

Measurement and determinants of tuberculosis outcome in Karonga District, Malawi

J R Glynn et al. Bull World Health Organ. 1998.

Abstract

Evaluation of disease outcome is central to the assessment of tuberculosis (TB) control programmes. In the study reported in this article we examined the factors influencing the measurement of outcome, survival rates during and after treatment, smear conversion rates, and relapse rates for patients diagnosed with TB in a rural area of Malawi between 1986 and mid-1994. Patients with less certain diagnoses of TB were more likely to die than those with confirmed TB, both among those who were seropositive and those who were seronegative to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The mortality rate among smear-positive patients with a separate culture-positive specimen was half that of patients with no such diagnostic confirmation. Patients not registered by the Ministry of Health had much higher mortality and default rates than did registered patients. Among smear-positive patients, HIV serostatus was the most important influence on mortality both during and after treatment (crude hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) = 5.6 (3.0-10) and 7.7 (3.4-17), resp.), but HIV serostatus did not influence smear conversion rates. The initial degree of smear positivity influenced smear conversion rates, but not mortality rates. No significant predictors of relapse were identified. Unless considerable care is taken to include all TB patients, and to exclude nontuberculous patients, recorded TB outcome statistics are difficult to interpret and may be misleading. In populations with high rates of HIV infection, TB target cure rates of 85% are unrealistic. When new interventions are assessed it cannot be assumed that factors which influence the smear conversion rate will also influence the mortality rate.

PIP: Measurement of treatment outcome is central to tuberculosis control programs. A study conducted in Malawi's rural Karonga District in 1986-94 examined factors influencing the measurement of outcome: survival rates during and after treatment, smear conversion rates, and relapse rates for patients diagnosed with tuberculosis. Information was available on 1655 certain, probable, or possible tuberculosis patients. Overall, 22.5% of patients died before the end of treatment, 57.9% completed treatment and were discharged, 4.3% moved out of the district, and 15.3% defaulted or were lost to follow-up. 35% of HIV-positive patients, compared with 11% of HIV-negative patients, died before the end of treatment. Patients with uncertain tuberculosis diagnoses were more likely to die than those with certain diagnoses, regardless of their HIV serostatus. The mortality rate among smear-positive patients with a separate culture-positive specimen was half that of patients with no such diagnostic confirmation. Patients not registered by the Ministry of Health had substantially higher mortality and default rates than registered patients. HIV serostatus was the most important determinant of mortality both during and after treatment in smear-positive patients (crude hazards ratios, 5.6 and 7.7, respectively; 95% confidence intervals, 3.0-10 and 3.4-17, respectively), but HIV status did not influence smear conversion rates. The initial degree of smear positivity influenced smear conversion rates but not mortality rates. No significant predictors of relapse were identified. These findings indicate that tuberculosis outcome statistics may be misleading unless care is taken to include all tuberculosis patients and exclude nontubercular patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1989;67(1):35-42 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1996 Jul 6;348(9019):17-24 - PubMed
    1. Tubercle. 1991 Mar;72(1):1-6 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Oct;144(4):750-5 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1991 Nov 23;338(8778):1305-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources