Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Oct;12(10):1204-8.
doi: 10.1007/s004649900821.

Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study

T J Heikkinen  1 , K Haukipuro, A Hulkko
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study

T J Heikkinen et al. Surg Endosc. 1998 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomy (OA).

Methods: Forty consecutive patients were randomized to either the LA (n = 19) or OA (n = 21) group.

Results: The medians of operative times in the LA and OA groups were 31.5 and 41 min, respectively. The total operation room times were 91 and 82 min, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain or fatigue, but return to normal life was faster in the LA group (14 versus 26. 5 days). The median hospital costs per patient were 8,538 and 6,788 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) in the LA and OA groups, respectively; but the total costs among working patients were lower in the LA group (20, 963 versus 27,778 FIM) due to faster return to work.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe as open appendectomy. The hospital costs are higher, but LA offers significant cost savings to the payer for working patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources