This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):590-1.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)22034-4.

Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?

J P Ioannidis¹, J Lau

Affiliations

PMID: 9746014
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)22034-4

Comment

Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?

J P Ioannidis et al. Lancet. 1998.

. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):590-1.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)22034-4.

Authors

J P Ioannidis¹, J Lau

Affiliation

¹ Therapeutics Research Program, DAIDS/NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.

PMID: 9746014
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)22034-4

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, Tugwell P, Klassen TP. Moher D, et al. Lancet. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):609-13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9746022

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.