Efficacy of PdB in preventing intraoperative risk of infectious diseases
- PMID: 9747173
- DOI: 10.1007/s002689900523
Efficacy of PdB in preventing intraoperative risk of infectious diseases
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the number of punctures surgeons and assistants suffer during operations involving a laparotomy during the intraabdominal and closure phases; and (2) determine if the number of puncture injuries during wound closure can be reduced using a new surgical instrument (PdB) that protects the surgeon's hands and the patient's viscera against needlesticks. For the first objective, all laparotomies performed during 1 month (n = 52) were controlled, collecting the gloves used and determining the number of perforations. For the second objective, a randomized prospective controlled study, involving two series of 100 medial laparotomies, was carried out. The incidence of perforations was 29% during the intraabdominal phase and 16% during the wound closure phase. The glove perforation rate while closing medial laparotomies was 31.5% if the PdB was not used and 3% if the PdB was used (p < 0.0001). The glove perforation rate during laparotomy is significant, but with the use of the PdB this incidence can be significantly reduced.
Similar articles
-
[The risk of needle-stick-injuries during abdominal closure].Zentralbl Chir. 1996;121(1):30-4. Zentralbl Chir. 1996. PMID: 8852738 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.Postgrad Med J. 2001 Jul;77(909):458-60. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.909.458. Postgrad Med J. 2001. PMID: 11423598 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Reduction in incidence of glove perforation during laparotomy wound closure by 'no touch' technique.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Sep;75(5):330-2. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993. PMID: 8215148 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations.Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4 Suppl):90-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00145-8. Am J Prev Med. 2000. PMID: 10793285 Review.
-
Time to consider blunt needles for implant surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis shows that blunt suture needles reduce glove perforation.Surgeon. 2024 Apr;22(2):107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Nov 10. Surgeon. 2024. PMID: 37951800
Cited by
-
Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD009170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009170.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 22071864 Free PMC article.
-
[HCV, HBV and HIV infections: risk for surgeon and staff. Results and consequences of routine screening in emergency patients].Chirurg. 2003 Nov;74(11):1026-33. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0741-4. Chirurg. 2003. PMID: 14605720 German.
-
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16855997 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical