The false-negative mammogram
- PMID: 9747612
- DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.18.5.9747612
The false-negative mammogram
Abstract
In general, failure to detect or correctly characterize breast cancer can be attributed to one of four main factors: inherent limitations of screen-film mammography, inadequate radiographic technique, subtle or unusual lesion characteristics, and interpretation error. The restricted latitude and display contrast of screen-film mammography are among the significant factors that result in decreased visualization of breast tumors and microcalcifications in patients with dense fibroglandular tissue. Unlike the inherent limitations of screen-film mammography, a poor radiographic technique can be improved on and should be eliminated. Crucial components of a well-performed mammographic examination are correct positioning, adequate compression, and proper image exposure. Lesion characteristics that may lead to a false-negative mammogram include small size, a site where visualization is difficult, visualization on only one view, a benign or probably benign appearance, lack of a desmoplastic reaction, and slow or no apparent growth. Causes of interpretation error include suboptimal viewing conditions, outside distractions, lack of a systematic approach, oversight of a subtle lesion because of an obvious finding, lack of knowledge of clinical findings, imprecise correlation with results of other studies, and nonbelief. Recognition of these various factors should help decrease the rate of false-negative mammograms.
Similar articles
-
Detecting film-screen artifacts in mammography using a model-based approach.IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999 Oct;18(10):1016-24. doi: 10.1109/42.811313. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999. PMID: 10628960
-
Interpreting one-view mammographic findings: minimizing callbacks while maximizing cancer detection.Radiographics. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):928-40. doi: 10.1148/rg.344130066. Radiographics. 2014. PMID: 25019432
-
Mammography in hospital patients: use and misuse.J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992 Feb;37(1):16-8. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992. PMID: 1573600
-
[Carcinoma with false negative mammogram: when and how?].J Radiol. 2004 Dec;85(12 Pt 2):2063-7. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(04)97782-7. J Radiol. 2004. PMID: 15692420 Review. French.
-
Mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer.Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1996 Mar;23 Suppl 1:8-13. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1996. PMID: 8702316 Review.
Cited by
-
Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study.J Digit Imaging. 2019 Oct;32(5):746-760. doi: 10.1007/s10278-018-00174-z. J Digit Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31410677 Free PMC article.
-
Electromagnetic spectroscopy of normal breast tissue specimens obtained from reduction surgeries: comparison of optical and microwave properties.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Oct;55(10):2444-51. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.925700. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008. PMID: 18838370 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery-Results from a postmarketing study.J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(3):361-368. doi: 10.1002/jso.26721. Epub 2021 Nov 1. J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34724205 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Refining breast cancer classification: Customized attention integration approaches with dense and residual networks for enhanced detection.Digit Health. 2025 Jan 6;11:20552076241309947. doi: 10.1177/20552076241309947. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 39777055 Free PMC article.
-
Mammography-based artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and BI-RADS categorization using multi-view and multi-level convolutional neural networks.Insights Imaging. 2025 May 21;16(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01983-x. Insights Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40397242 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical