Intraorbital implants after enucleation and their complications: a 10-year review
- PMID: 9747679
- DOI: 10.1001/archopht.116.9.1199
Intraorbital implants after enucleation and their complications: a 10-year review
Abstract
Background: Many different types of orbital implants have been used after enucleation. Associated complications such as infection, exposure, extrusion, and ptosis have been reported.
Objective: To describe 342 consecutive patients who underwent enucleation with intraorbital implant placement at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla, during the past 10.5 years and their complications.
Methods: Medical records of orbital implantation after enucleation performed by 3 surgeons (T.G.M., D.T., and T.J.) were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data, ocular diagnosis, previous ophthalmic surgery, implant characteristics, and postoperative complications were described in all patients, with a minimum of 2 months' follow-up, using a standardized format.
Results: Eleven complications were observed in 7 patients. Four patients had exposure of the implant, and 1 of these patients developed associated infection. Three patients developed pyogenic granulomas, 1 patient developed ptosis requiring surgical intervention, 1 patient had long-term orbital discomfort, and 1 patient developed an inclusion cyst.
Conclusion: Complications after enucleation with orbital implant placement are minimal and are observed with both porous and acrylic orbital implants.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of efficacy and complications: primary pediatric orbital implants after enucleation.Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Apr;118(4):503-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.4.503. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000. PMID: 10766136
-
Complications of porous spherical orbital implants.Ophthalmology. 1995 Apr;102(4):586-93. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30991-8. Ophthalmology. 1995. PMID: 7536909
-
The porous polyethylene/bioglass spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 170 cases.Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):21-7. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181de01a7. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 20700071
-
Long-term complications of different porous orbital implants: a 21-year review.Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 May;101(5):681-685. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308932. Epub 2016 Jul 29. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 27474155 Review.
-
Porous polyethylene orbital implant in the pediatric population.Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;138(3):425-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.04.062. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004. PMID: 15364225 Review.
Cited by
-
Porous Hydroxyapatite and Aluminium-Oxide Ceramic Orbital Implant Evaluation Using CBCT Scanning: A Method for In Vivo Porous Structure Evaluation and Monitoring.Int J Biomater. 2012;2012:764749. doi: 10.1155/2012/764749. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Int J Biomater. 2012. PMID: 22481940 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term infectious complications of using porous polyethylene mesh for orbital fracture reconstruction.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(25):e3819. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003819. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27336867 Free PMC article.
-
Enucleation in malignant choroidal melanoma - results in 15 years of using a new material in the prosthesis of the orbital cavity.J Med Life. 2012 Jun 12;5(2):185-8. Epub 2012 Jun 18. J Med Life. 2012. PMID: 22802888 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted Multimodality Treatment to Eliminate the Need for Enucleation in Advanced Coats Disease.J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Nov 28:24741264241301812. doi: 10.1177/24741264241301812. Online ahead of print. J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024. PMID: 39619484 Free PMC article.
-
The Evolution of Orbital Implants and Current Breakthroughs in Material Design, Selection, Characterization, and Clinical Use.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 17;9:800998. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.800998. eCollection 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35252161 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous