Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients after 1 year of treatment with rilmenidine: a double-blind, randomized, controlled (versus nifedipine) study
- PMID: 9747912
Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients after 1 year of treatment with rilmenidine: a double-blind, randomized, controlled (versus nifedipine) study
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of 1-year treatment with rilmenidine, an oxazoline compound that exerts its antihypertensive effects through binding to imidazoline receptors in the brainstem, on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) secondary to essential, mild-to-moderate hypertension [supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP)95-115 mmHg].
Methods: We performed a double-blind, randomized, controlled (versus slow-release nifedipine) trial. Adjustment of treatment took place every month (M) between inclusion (MO) and an evaluation after 6 months (M6), then during M9 and after 1 year (M12) to achieve supine DBP values < or = 90 mmHg. Patients were dropped from our study if they had DBP> 95mmHg during two consecutive visits or DBP>115 mmHg on one occasion. The daily dosage of rilmenidine was 1 mg, and could be increased to 2 mg/day. The daily dosage of slow-release nifedipine was started from the beginning at the maximum dosage of 40 mg/day, so that there was no true adjustment of treatment despite the allocation of patients to a different unit in the case of DBP> 95 mmHg. The primary criterion was the change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI, g/m2), assessed by echocardiography, between MO and M12 for patients who completed the trial.
Results: After a 1-month placebo run-in period, 76 patients were selected and 73 were included (35 treated with rilmenidine and 38 treated with nifedipine). Fifteen patients withdrew from the study and two completed the study with a major deviation from protocol, leaving 56 patients (24 treated with rilmenidine and 32 treated with nifedipine) for a per-protocol analysis. Baseline demographic characteristics and history of arterial hypertension for the rilmenidine and nifedipine groups were similar, for included patients and for those taken into account for the per-protocol analysis. Between MO and M12, DBP in members of the per-protocol population was adequately controlled for those in the rilmenidine group (102.7+/-4.6 versus 88.5+/-7.1 mmHg, respectively) and for those in the nifedipine group (102.7+/-5.1 versus 85.6+/-79 mmHg, respectively). During MO, LVMI of patients in the rilmenidine group (176.9+/-41.3 g/m2) was slightly higher than that of patients in the nifedipine group (172.6+/-35.1 g/m2). During M12, LVMI was observed to have decreased both for patients in the rilmenidine group (to 154.8+/-40.2 g/m2, a decrease of 22.1+/-23.3 g/m2, P< 0.001) and for those in the nifedipine group (to 145.6+/-36.4 g/m2, a decrease of 26.9+/-29.5 g/m2, P< 0.001) but the difference between these two groups was not significant (P= 0.5).
Conclusion: One-year treatment with a daily dosage of 1 or 2 mg rilmenidine achieves a significant reduction of left ventricular mass, which is not statistically different than that occurring with a daily dosage of 40 mg of slow-release nifedipine.
Similar articles
-
Value of rilmenidine therapy and its combination with perindopril on blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension (VERITAS).Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):205-17. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001659. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003. PMID: 12803735
-
Short-term effects of rilmenidine on left ventricular hypertrophy and systolic and diastolic function in patients with essential hypertension: comparison with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist.Jpn Heart J. 2003 Sep;44(5):693-704. doi: 10.1536/jhj.44.693. Jpn Heart J. 2003. PMID: 14587651
-
Efficacy and tolerability of rilmenidine compared with isradipine in hypertensive patients with features of metabolic syndrome.Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1287-94. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115577. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006. PMID: 16834827
-
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockade in the treatment of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2002 Jun;50(3):169-74. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2002. PMID: 12107398 Review.
-
Rilmenidine: a clinical overview.Am J Hypertens. 2000 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):106S-111S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(00)00226-0. Am J Hypertens. 2000. PMID: 10921529 Review.
Cited by
-
Drugs acting on imidazoline receptors: a review of their pharmacology, their use in blood pressure control and their potential interest in cardioprotection.Drugs. 1999 Nov;58(5):799-812. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958050-00003. Drugs. 1999. PMID: 10595861 Review.
-
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure Trial.Hypertension. 2015 Dec;66(6):1123-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06236. Epub 2015 Oct 12. Hypertension. 2015. PMID: 26459421 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
I1 imidazoline agonists. General clinical pharmacology of imidazoline receptors: implications for the treatment of the elderly.Drugs Aging. 2000 Aug;17(2):133-59. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200017020-00005. Drugs Aging. 2000. PMID: 10984201 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical