Implications of failing to achieve successful long-term maintenance treatment of recurrent unipolar major depression

Abstract

This is a review article that describes current data, issues, and controversies regarding long-term maintenance treatment of depression. The authors suggest that the issues represent a public health crisis. This paper will identify the need, from both a health-care and economic perspective, for more research on the efficacy of maintenance treatment for this pernicious and lifelong disorder. Data will be reviewed on the natural course of unipolar depression, focusing on clinical predictors that increase the risk of a relapse or recurrence. This review will include new data from the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Depression Study. Failing to achieve adequate maintenance treatment for unipolar recurrent major depression has psychopathological and psychosocial consequences, decreasing work productivity and the quality of a person's life. Published double-blind placebo-controlled studies on continuation treatment of major depression will be reviewed. The two competed double-blind placebo-controlled long-term maintenance studies of recurrent unipolar major depression will be discussed in detail. Despite the positive findings from research done to date, there remain many unresolved questions relating to the maintenance treatment of recurrent unipolar major depression, and the need for research in this area is critical. The paper concludes with recommendations for long-term maintenance treatment of unipolar major depression.