Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Aug;24(8):795-800.
doi: 10.1007/s001340050668.

Effect of enteral versus parenteral feeding on hepatic blood flow and steady state propofol pharmacokinetics in ICU patients

Affiliations

Effect of enteral versus parenteral feeding on hepatic blood flow and steady state propofol pharmacokinetics in ICU patients

N Van Brandt et al. Intensive Care Med. 1998 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of switching from parenteral to enteral feeding on liver blood flow and propofol steady-state blood concentrations in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Design and patients: Steady-state blood concentrations of propofol were measured in eight ICU patients before (on days D -3, D -2, and D -1) and after (on days D + 1, D + 2, and D + 3) switching from parenteral to enteral feeding (on day DO). All patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of propofol (4.5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) from several days before the start of the study, continuing throughout the experimental period. Hepatic blood flow was estimated by measuring steady-state D-sorbitol hepatic clearance.

Results: Hepatic blood flow was high and was not affected by switching from parenteral to enteral feeding: 33 +/- 8 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1) (mean +/- SD) and 33 +/- 10 ml min(-1) x kg(-1) on D -3 and D -1, respectively, as compared to 37 +/- 11 ml x min(-1) kg(-1) and 34 +/- 8 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1) on days D + 1 and D + 3, respectively. Systemic clearance of propofol was much higher than liver blood flow with average values on the six observation days ranging from 74.0 to 81.2 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1) and was not affected by switching from parenteral to enteral feeding.

Conclusions: Liver blood flow and systemic clearance of propofol were not affected by switching from parenteral to enteral feeding in the eight ICU patients studied. Extrahepatic clearance accounted for at least two thirds of the overall systemic clearance of propofol.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Anaesth. 1992 May;68(5):486-91 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986 Jul;40(1):29-36 - PubMed
    1. Xenobiotica. 1992 Jan;22(1):105-14 - PubMed
    1. Drug Metab Dispos. 1996 Apr;24(4):502-5 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1993 Oct-Dec;18(4):327-31 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources