Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency?
- PMID: 9764704
Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency?
Abstract
Advanced perforated appendicitis with localized findings has classically been treated with either operative therapy or with percutaneous drainage. The role of nonoperative therapy followed by interval appendectomy (IA) remains controversial. We assessed the safety and efficacy of conservative management for perforated appendicitis in a 5-year review of patients treated conservatively for perforated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon. Patients were treated initially with intravenous antibiotics, and CT-guided drainage was used only if the patient failed to improve after 48 to 72 hours. Patients still not improving underwent appendectomy. Patients responding to conservative therapy were recommended IA in 6 to 12 weeks. Sixty-six patients with 54 abscesses and 10 phlegmons were treated. Fifty-one patients (92%) improved without surgery. Only 58 per cent of the abscesses required percutaneous drainage. The mean length of stay for conservative therapy was 7.6 days. Forty-one patients underwent IA with a 10 per cent morbidity and a mean length of stay of 1.4 days. Conservative management of appendicitis with localized perforation or phlegmon is safe and effective. Percutaneous drainage is frequently not required. IA is associated with low morbidity without prolonged hospitalization.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of outcome for children with perforated appendicitis initially treated with non-operative management.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004 Winter;5(4):349-56. doi: 10.1089/sur.2004.5.349. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004. PMID: 15744126
-
Perforated appendicitis: urgency or interval surgery?Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Dec;132(6):539-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-981369. Zentralbl Chir. 2007. PMID: 18098082
-
Use and accuracy of computed tomography scan in diagnosing perforated appendicitis.Am Surg. 2015 Apr;81(4):404-7. Am Surg. 2015. PMID: 25831188
-
Perforated appendicitis within an inguinal hernia: case report and review of the literature.Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Apr;92(4):700-2. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997. PMID: 9128329 Review.
-
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Appendiceal Mass Formed After Acute Perforated Appendicitis.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Jun;27(3):132-138. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000404. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017. PMID: 28414702 Review.
Cited by
-
Appendicitis is a Severe Disease in Elderly Patients: A Twenty-Year Audit.JSLS. 2020 Jul-Sep;24(3):e2020.00046. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00046. JSLS. 2020. PMID: 32863702 Free PMC article.
-
The Global Burden of Appendicitis in 204 Countries and Territories from 1990 to 2019.Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 13;14:1487-1499. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S376665. eCollection 2022. Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 36536897 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy.World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 28;23(32):5849-5859. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i32.5849. World J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28932077 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acute appendicitis in the elderly in the twenty-first century.J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Apr;19(4):730-5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2716-9. Epub 2015 Feb 14. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015. PMID: 25681217
-
Evaluating conservative treatment for acute appendicitis with lump formation.J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Jan;5(1):33-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.93108. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012. PMID: 22416152 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical