Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: a discriminant function analysis
- PMID: 9771639
- DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4105.1185
Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: a discriminant function analysis
Abstract
Discriminant function analysis was employed to determine if grammatical morpheme production could be used to classify preschool-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) and children with typically developing language skills. Three variables were included in the discriminant analysis: a finite verb morpheme composite, a noun morpheme composite, and mean length of utterance in morphemes. The children with SLI and age-matched controls were discriminated with high levels of accuracy, though the three variables did not yield identical classifications. Across two samples of typically developing children and children with SLI, the verb morpheme composite showed sensitivity exceeding 85% and specificity of 100%. In light of these results and growing evidence that problems with finite verb morphology continue into the school years in children with SLI, the verb morpheme composite was considered to hold promise as a clinical marker for SLI.
Similar articles
-
Grammatical morphology in school-age children with and without language impairment: a discriminant function analysis.Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011 Oct;42(4):550-60. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0029). Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011. PMID: 21969530 Free PMC article.
-
Grammatical morphology is not a sensitive marker of language impairment in Icelandic in children aged 4-14 years.J Commun Disord. 2016 Jul-Aug;62:82-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 8. J Commun Disord. 2016. PMID: 27314205
-
Grammatical deficits in Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Aug;40(4):809-20. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4004.809. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997. PMID: 9263945
-
The use of grammatical morphemes reflecting aspect and modality by children with specific language impairment.J Child Lang. 2003 Nov;30(4):769-95. doi: 10.1017/s0305000903005816. J Child Lang. 2003. PMID: 14686084 Review.
-
Using Language Sample Analysis in Clinical Practice: Measures of Grammatical Accuracy for Identifying Language Impairment in Preschool and School-Aged Children.Semin Speech Lang. 2016 May;37(2):106-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580740. Epub 2016 Apr 25. Semin Speech Lang. 2016. PMID: 27111270 Review.
Cited by
-
Using language sampling in clinical assessments with bilingual children: challenges and future directions.Semin Speech Lang. 2009 Nov;30(4):234-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241722. Epub 2009 Oct 22. Semin Speech Lang. 2009. PMID: 19851951 Free PMC article.
-
Impaired statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in adolescents with specific language impairment.Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 6;5:175. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00175. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24639661 Free PMC article.
-
Grammatical morphology in school-age children with and without language impairment: a discriminant function analysis.Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011 Oct;42(4):550-60. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0029). Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011. PMID: 21969530 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Disorder Within Variation: Production of English Grammatical Forms by English Language Learners.Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Apr 5;49(2):277-291. doi: 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0027. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018. PMID: 29621806 Free PMC article.
-
Morphosyntax in Poor Comprehenders.Read Writ. 2015 Sep;28(7):1051-1070. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9562-3. Epub 2015 Apr 1. Read Writ. 2015. PMID: 27397969 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical