Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Oct;88(10):1469-75.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1469.

Religion and mortality among the community-dwelling elderly

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Religion and mortality among the community-dwelling elderly

D Oman et al. Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: This study analyzed the prospective association between attending religious services and all-cause mortality to determine whether the association is explainable by 6 confounding factors: demographics, health status, physical functioning, health habits, social functioning and support, and psychological state.

Methods: The association between self-reported religious attendance and subsequent mortality over 5 years for 1931 older residents of Marin County, California, was examined by proportional hazards regression. Interaction terms of religion with social support were used to explore whether other forms of social support could substitute for religion and diminish its protective effect.

Results: Persons who attended religious services had lower mortality than those who did not (age- and sex-adjusted relative hazard [RH] = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52, 0.78). Multivariate adjustment reduced this relationship only slightly (RH = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.62, 0.94), primarily by including physical functioning and social support. Contrary to hypothesis, religious attendance tended to be slightly more protective for those with high social support.

Conclusions: Lower mortality rates for those who attend religious services are only partly explained by the 6 possible confounders listed above. Psychodynamic and other explanations need further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1967 Apr;5(4):432-43 - PubMed
    1. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Nov;52(6):S306-16 - PubMed
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;18(1):54-61 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1978 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S191-S198 - PubMed
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Jan;46(1):49-57 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources