Increase in sick leave rates caused by back pain among pregnant Swedish women after amelioration of social benefits. A paradox
- PMID: 9779532
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00014
Increase in sick leave rates caused by back pain among pregnant Swedish women after amelioration of social benefits. A paradox
Abstract
Study design: A retrospective population study.
Objectives: To explore whether the increase in social benefits for pregnant women introduced in Sweden between 1978 and in 1986 was associated with a decrease in the use of sick leave caused by back pain during the same period.
Summary of background data: Back pain is a common condition among Swedish pregnant women. It may be regarded as a normal discomfort of pregnancy, because at least 50% of pregnant women experience back pain to some extent during pregnancy.
Methods: Participants were women consecutively delivered in 1978 (n = 1524) and in 1986 (n = 1688). Between these two time points, the number of offered days of parental benefit increased and a new benefit, the pregnancy benefit, was introduced. Data were collected from the antenatal care and delivery records and from pregnant women's social insurance files.
Results: From 1978 to 1986 the use of sick leave because of back pain during pregnancy increased. The number of pregnant women granted sick leave employed pregnant women because of back pain increased from 11% in 1978 to 29% in 1986 (P < 0.001). The sick leave rate increased in most occupations and especially among young women.
Conclusions: The Swedish society has provided ample social benefits to allow the pregnant woman to take leave from work, without having to be labeled as "ill," because of normal conditions such as back pain during pregnancy. Instead of an expected decrease in sick leave because of back pain during pregnancy, an increase was observed.
Similar articles
-
Changes in sick leave rates and the use of pregnancy-associated social benefits among pregnant Swedish women: an outcomes study.J Womens Health. 1998 Mar;7(2):249-60. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.249. J Womens Health. 1998. PMID: 9555690
-
Newly delivered women's evaluation of personal health status and attitudes towards sickness absence and social benefits.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Feb;81(2):104-11. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2002.810203.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002. PMID: 11942898
-
No association found between sickness absence and duration of pregnancy benefit.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005 Sep;23(3):178-83. doi: 10.1080/02813430500197670. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005. PMID: 16162471
-
Sick leave and social benefits during pregnancy--a Swedish-Norwegian comparison.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Sep;76(8):748-54. doi: 10.3109/00016349709024341. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997. PMID: 9348252 Review.
-
[Pregnancy and sick leave].Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 Oct 24;156(43):6359-65. Ugeskr Laeger. 1994. PMID: 7810009 Review. Danish.
Cited by
-
Pregnancy-related low back pain and pelvic girdle pain approximately 14 months after pregnancy - pain status, self-rated health and family situation.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 25;14:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-48. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 24460727 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a weight-gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women on sickness absence and pregnancy benefits.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Jun;31(2):106-10. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.754091. Epub 2013 Jan 10. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013. PMID: 23301596 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Functional Stability Exercises on Alleviating Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy: A Review.Cureus. 2023 Nov 13;15(11):e48769. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48769. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38098896 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms.Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):440-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1487-6. Epub 2010 Jul 1. Eur Spine J. 2011. PMID: 20593205 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors Associated with Low Back Pain among A Group of 1510 Pregnant Women.J Pers Med. 2020 Jun 15;10(2):51. doi: 10.3390/jpm10020051. J Pers Med. 2020. PMID: 32549306 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials