Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Sep-Oct;30(5):240-3.

Condom use among women choosing long-term hormonal contraception

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9782048
Free article

Condom use among women choosing long-term hormonal contraception

L F Cushman et al. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Sep-Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Context: Women who rely on long-term hormonal contraception may neglect to use condoms, and thus increase their risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS.

Methods: Data from a prospective, multisite study were collected to examine the probability of condom use among 1,073 new users of either the contraceptive implant or injectable; users were interviewed when they accepted their method and again six months to one year later. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors that significantly predicted the likelihood of dual method use.

Results: Condom use dropped markedly among women who adopted long-term hormonal contraception. The proportion who always used condoms in the previous three months fell from 21% at the time of adoption to 11% at follow-up. Among women with one sexual partner, this decrease was from 20% to 10%; however, among those with more than one partner, use increased from 25% to 31%. The factors significantly predicting dual method use included previous condom use (odds ratio of 2.5), receipt of AIDS-specific counseling (odds ratio of 1.6), the perception of being at some risk of AIDS at baseline (odds ratio of 1.4) and having had more than one sexual partner over the study period (odds ratio of 5.4). In addition, injectable users, teenagers and black women were more likely than other women to use condoms with their hormonal method.

Conclusions: Although condom use among all women declined markedly once they initiated long-term hormonal contraception, frequency of condom use varied by subgroup and was associated with several factors. Most importantly, women with more than one sexual partner and those who received a message during counseling on the need to continue using condoms were more likely than others to use condoms in conjunction with the implant or injectable.

PIP: Concerns have been raised that women who use long-term hormonal contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy will fail to protect themselves from sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including AIDS, through concomitant condom use. This possibility was investigated in a prospective (1993-94), multi-site US (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Dallas, Texas; and New York, New York) study of 1073 new users of either contraceptive implants or Depo-Provera. The mean age of study participants was 23 years; 63% were Hispanic, 24% Black, and 13% White. Overall, the proportion of women who always used condoms in the previous 3 months dropped from 21% at the time of method initiation to 11% at follow-up 6-12 months after enrollment. However, use increased from 25% to 31% among women with more than 1 sexual partner. Significant predictors of dual method use included previous condom use (odds ratio (OR), 2.5); receipt of AIDS-specific counseling (OR, 1.6); the perception, at baseline, of being at some risk of AIDS (OR, 1.4); and more than 1 sexual partner during the study period (OR, 5.4). In addition, injectable users, teenagers, and Black women were more likely than other women to use condoms with their hormonal method. These findings have important implications for family planning programs, especially the need for counseling on the continued importance of condom use for STD prevention when pregnancy is prevented by non-barrier methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances