A naturalistic study of the chronic fatigue syndrome among women in primary care

Abstract

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a controversial illness without clear etiology, causes profound debilitation in its sufferers. This study explored subjects' perceptions of the variables that mediated the course of their illness and identified coping strategies in 15 women with CFS referred from the practice of a primary care physician. Exploratory semistructured interviews were adapted from Kleinman's Illness Narratives. Four instruments were used: the Beck Depression Inventory, the Sickness Impact Profile, a modified Karnofsky scale, and the Defense Mechanism Rating Scale. Of the 15 women, 60% reported improvement and/or recovery at the time of the interview. Improvement was associated with social support and lower levels of depressive symptoms. Health status was influenced by how subjects perceived their illness, their future, and the doctor's prognosis; and by the physician's early diagnosis, validation of the CFS, and intensive medical follow-up. Obsessional and healthy neurotic defense levels predominated, which differs from historical comparison groups with dysthymia and panic disorder. Psychological adaptation to CFS is similar to adaptive coping in other chronic illnesses: subjective perceptions of health status can predict functional status. Physician validation is particularly important given the controversial status of CFS. Maintaining relationships with others--doctor, work, family, and group/spiritual activities reflected healthy coping strategies that promoted hope and attitudinal shifts. The finding of a mixture of neurotic and healthy defenses and a low proportion of defenses associated with personality disorders has not been previously reported in the CFS literature and warrants further investigation.