Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Oct;228(4):449-61.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00002.

Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study

J R Siewert et al. Ann Surg. 1998 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: In 1986 a prospective multicenter observation trial in patients with resected gastric cancer was initiated in Germany. An analysis of prognostic factors based on the 10-year survival data is now presented.

Patients and methods: A total of 1654 patients treated for gastric cancer between 1986 and 1989 at 19 centers in Germany and Austria were included. The resected specimen were evaluated histopathologically according to a standardized protocol. The extent of lymphadenectomy was classified after surgery based on the number of removed lymph nodes on histopathologic assessment (25 or fewer removed nodes, D1 or standard lymphadenectomy; >25 removed nodes, D2 or extended lymphadenectomy). Endpoint of the study was death. Follow-up is complete for 97% of the included patients (median follow-up of the surviving patients is 8.4 years). Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis.

Results: A complete macroscopic and microscopic tumor resection (R0 resection according to the UICC 1997) could be achieved in 1182 of the 1654 patients (71.5%). The calculated 10-year survival rate in the entire patient population was 26.3% +/- 4.7%; it was 36.1% +/- 1.6% after an R0 resection. In the total patient population there was an independent prognostic effect of the ratio between invaded and removed lymph nodes, the residual tumor (R) category, the pT category, the presence of postsurgical complications, and the presence of distant metastases. Multivariate analysis in the subgroup of patients who had a UICC R0 resection confirmed the nodal status, the pT category, and the presence of postsurgical complications as the major independent prognostic factors. The extent of lymph node dissection had a significant and independent effect on the 10-year survival rate in patients with stage II tumors. This effect was present in the subgroups with (pT2N1) and without (pT3N0) lymph node metastases on standard histopathologic assessment. The beneficial effect of extended lymph node dissection for stage II tumors persisted when patients with insufficient lymph node dissection (<15 nodes) were excluded from the analysis. There was no difference in the postsurgical morbidity and mortality rates between patients with standard and extended lymph node dissection.

Conclusions: Lymph node ratio and lymph node status are the most important prognostic factors in patients with resected gastric cancer. In experienced centers, extended lymph node dissection does not increase the mortality or morbidity rate of resection for gastric cancer but markedly improves long-term survival in patients with stage II tumors. This effect appears to be independent of the phenomenon of stage migration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Prognostic factors in gastric cancer.
    Pacelli F, Doglietto GB, Caprino P. Pacelli F, et al. Ann Surg. 1999 Sep;230(3):450-1. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00018. Ann Surg. 1999. PMID: 10493492 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer.
    Roukos DH. Roukos DH. Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):719-20. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00016. Ann Surg. 2000. PMID: 11066146 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1993 Aug;80(8):1015-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1993 Nov;218(5):583-92 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1993 May 15;71(10):2918-25 - PubMed
    1. Chirurg. 1992 Aug;63(8):656-61 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1992 Mar;127(3):290-4 - PubMed